Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893797›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society2025

Object Functions and Words Reexamined: Toddlers' Recognition of Function Depends on Object Type.

Haley Weaver, Jenny Saffran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haley WeaverDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States.
Jenny SaffranDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States.

Funding

Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Statistical Learning in Language AcquisitionR37HD037466 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SAFFRAN, JENNY R. · 2011 to 2019
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD037466NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of function in toddlers' object labeling has been debated for decades in developmental science. We aimed to clarify the relation between toddlers' understanding of functions and words using a set of everyday objects that varied in the number of associated functions (e.g., balls can be bounced, thrown, or rolled while toothbrushes primarily brush teeth). Forty 23- to 25-month-old monolingual English-learning toddlers completed a preferential looking paradigm in which objects were used in conventional and unconventional ways, designed to measure expectations about object functional expectations. We also measured toddlers' lexical knowledge about these objects using a looking-while-listening task. Finally, we assessed productive vocabulary size using the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory: Words and Sentences. The results suggest that toddlers have expectations about the functions of some objects, but not others. In particular, these expectations were stronger for objects that are tightly linked with their functions in everyday experiences, and for children who have larger vocabularies. These findings also suggest that toddlers' ability to demonstrate functional knowledge may depend on the specific objects included in the task.

Indexed as

lexical representationsobject functionword meanings

Identifiers

PMID40893797
PMCPMC12396837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.