Mimicking scaffold membrane based electrospun polyurethane fibers with functional extracellular-like component coating for guided bone regeneration scaffolds.

Nattawat Watcharajittanont, Worasak Prarokijjak, Chayada Teanchai, Kanon Jatuworapruk, Jirut Meesane

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials and biosystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nattawat WatcharajittanontFaculty of Learning Sciences and Education, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

Worasak PrarokijjakFaculty of Learning Sciences and Education, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

Chayada TeanchaiResearch Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Kanon JatuworaprukDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

Jirut MeesaneInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Science and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mimicking scaffold membranes for guided bone regeneration were fabricated using electrospun polyurethane (PU) coated with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and sodium alginate. Five different proportions of PVA and sodium alginate (AGN) were compared as coating solutions for the electrospun PU membranes. Molecular organization, morphology, and physical, mechanical, and biological properties were investigated. The results demonstrated that the electro-spun PU membranes with PVA and sodium alginate coating showed molecular organization via chemical bonding. The coated membranes, especially PU/PVA:AGN (30:70), exhibited higher hydrophilicity, maximum load, and elasticity than membranes without coating, and they exhibited better cell adhesion, cell proliferation, ALP activity, and calcium deposition. In conclusion, we determined that our PU/PVA:AGN (30:70) periosteum mimicking membrane is a promising candidate for guided bone regeneration applications.

Indexed as

Electro-spinningGuided bone regenerationMimickingTissue scaffold

Identifiers

PMID40893789

DOI10.1016/j.bbiosy.2025.100116

PMCPMC12391835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.