ArticleSAGE open nursing
Impact of Deep Versus Shallow Tracheal Suctioning on Cardiovascular Indices and Suction Induced Complications Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tracheal suctioning is a critical component of care for mechanically ventilated patients' treatment. The effectiveness and associated complications of suctioning can vary depending on the depth of catheter insertion. Although several guidelines assist nurses in selecting the appropriate suctioning technique, while the optimal suctioning depth remains uncertain. Purpose of the research: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing shallow (insertion of the suction catheter to a depth limited to the end of the endotracheal tube) versus deep tracheal suctioning (insertion of the suction catheter approximately 1 cm above carina) techniques on cardiovascular indices and suction-induced complications among mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups at a 1:1 ratio was carried out in Intensive care units of a tertiary hospital. Adult mechanically ventilated patients requiring tracheal suctioning were randomly assigned to either the shallow tracheal suctioning group (intervention) or the deep tracheal suctioning group (control). Cardiovascular indices (such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) and suction-induced complications (as hypoxemia, cardiac dysrhythmia, tracheal tissue injury, and increased intracranial pressure) were assessed at four specific times: before suctioning, immediately after suctioning, 5 min postsuctioning, and 10 min postsuctioning. Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study. Cardiovascular indices increased significantly following tracheal suctioning in the deep suctioning group compared to the shallow suctioning group ( Conclusions: Shallow tracheal suctioning results in less pronounced alterations in cardiovascular indices and fewer suction-induced complications compared to deep suctioning. These findings support the adoption of shallow suctioing as a safer and more favorable technique for managing mechanically ventilated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.