Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893656›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2025

Evaluation of a training for managers in using active and personal communication to stimulate employee participation in a workplace smoking cessation program.

Floor A van den Brand, Julia M van Koeveringe, Onno C P van Schayck, Gera E Nagelhout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Floor A van den BrandDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Julia M van KoeveringeDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Onno C P van SchayckDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gera E NagelhoutDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorkplace smoking cessation programs are effective in reducing smoking prevalence among employees with a lower socioeconomic position (SEP). However, effective participation of these employees remains challenging. This study evaluates a communication training program designed to equip managers with the skills to personally and actively engage employees in workplace smoking cessation initiatives.

methodsThis study, conducted in the Netherlands (September 2021-March 2023), used Intervention Mapping to develop a 90-minute interactive webinar to improve managers' knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and communication skills related to talking with employees about smoking cessation. A total of 107 managers participated. A mixed-methods approach was used for evaluation, including pre- and post-webinar questionnaires (completed by 50 participants) and two rounds of semi-structured interviews with 18 managers, around 3 and 12 months post-training.

resultsThe training led to a small increase in self-efficacy regarding smoking cessation conversations from 3.2 to 3.5 on a scale of 1 to 5 (p=0.015). In the first round of interviews, 5 of the 18 managers had engaged in personal conversations with employees about smoking cessation. Facilitators were a strong belief in one's own ability to succeed; opportunities to practice communication skills; positive past experiences addressing smoking behavior; supportive company regulations and national smoke-free policies and assistance provided by colleagues. Barriers included low confidence in communication skills; perceived time burden; limited motivation or perceived role responsibility; the social sensitivity of the topic and fear of negative reactions; the absence of an in-house cessation program and insufficient organizational support. One year post-training, only one manager had consistently implemented personal communication strategies, while most others cited unchanged barriers and a lack of organizational support as reasons for inaction.

conclusionsWhile managers recognized the importance of personal communication for smoking cessation, implementation and maintenance were limited due to personal and organizational barriers. Future training programs should be more extensive and ensure structural organizational support for workplace smoking cessation initiatives.

Indexed as

communication traininglow socioeconomic positionsmoking cessationworkplace health promotion

Identifiers

PMID40893656
PMCPMC12395514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.