ReviewJHLT open2025
Management of microaspiration and gastrointestinal dysfunction after lung transplantation: A narrative review.
Review in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergent Management of the Foregut Between Pulmonologists and Gastroenterologists in Advanced Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
- Updates, Management, and Future of Diagnosing and Managing Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanisms by which complex carbohydrates influence immune imbalance in COPD via the gut-lung axis: from colonic fermentation to pulmonary immune responses.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of late morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Increasing evidence implicates microaspiration, often secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, as a critical non-alloimmune driver of CLAD. However, its often silent presentation, diagnostic complexity, and heterogeneous management contribute to persistent knowledge and treatment gaps. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes recent literature on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and clinical impact of microaspiration and GI dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. We focus on emerging biomarkers (e.g., conjugated bile acids and pepsinogen A4), diagnostic modalities, and both medical and surgical treatment strategies aimed at mitigating aspiration-induced graft injury. Key Content and Findings: Microaspiration leads to epithelial damage, surfactant disruption, immune activation, and microbial dysbiosis, collectively promoting allograft dysfunction. Conjugated bile acids in large airway bronchial wash fluid and pepsinogen A4 have shown superior specificity as aspiration biomarkers compared to pepsin alone. Gastrointestinal disorders, such as GERD, gastroparesis, and esophageal dysmotility, frequently co-exist post-transplant and contribute to aspiration risk. Pharmacologic interventions provide limited benefit, while anti-reflux surgery significantly improves graft outcomes, particularly when performed early. Conservative measures such as head-of-bed elevation also reduce reflux burden and may complement therapeutic strategies. Conclusions: Microaspiration is a modifiable and underrecognized contributor to allograft injury. Integration of aspiration biomarkers, early reflux evaluation, and personalized stepwise management, including surgical intervention when indicated, may improve long-term transplant outcomes. This review provides clinicians with a structured framework for diagnosis and management of microaspiration-related injury in lung transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.