Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893625›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Deep Learning with Disc Photos or OCT Scans in Glaucoma Detection.

Abhilash Katuru, In Young Chung, Iyad Majid, Lucy Q Shen, Mengyu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhilash KaturuHarvard Ophthalmology AI Lab, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
In Young ChungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Iyad MajidHarvard Ophthalmology AI Lab, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Lucy Q ShenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Mengyu WangHarvard Ophthalmology AI Lab, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

Personalizing Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Norms for GlaucomaR21EY035298 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WANG, MENGYU · 2023 to 2023
$557k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a deep learning (DL) model using retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) maps from OCT scans can detect glaucoma, defined by functional visual field (VF) impairment, more accurately than a DL model using disc photos (DPs). A secondary objective was to assess the diagnostic performance of these DL models across demographic groups (race, sex, and ethnicity). Design: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary glaucoma center utilizing OCT and DP datasets collected between 2011 and 2022. Participants: Out of the 16 936 DP and OCT image sets, patients with Cirrus OCT images with a quality score ≥6 of 10 and reliable 24-2 Humphrey VF tests (fixation loss ≤33%, false-negative rate ≤20%, false-positive rate ≤20%), taken within 30 days of OCT, were included. Disc photos were obtained within 6 months of OCT. Data were randomly selected for training and testing of the DL models. Testing: Development of DL models utilizing either OCT RNFLT maps or DPs to detect glaucoma based on VF-defined functional impairment. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) for glaucoma detection, comparing the OCT-based DL model with the DP-based model. The secondary outcome was the AUC across demographic groups. Results: The OCT-based DL model achieved an AUC of 0.90, significantly outperforming the DP-based model (AUC = 0.86, Conclusions: When glaucoma diagnosis was based on functional deficit, the OCT-based DL model offered greater accuracy in detecting glaucoma than the DP-based model, likely due to its use of objective and quantitative RNFLT measurements. This work supports the use of OCT-based DL models for glaucoma detection, while observed demographic disparities underscore the need for equitable datasets to ensure fair DL-driven glaucoma diagnosis across populations. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDisc photographyGlaucomaOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID40893625
PMCPMC12395170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.