ArticleOphthalmology science
Deep Learning with Disc Photos or OCT Scans in Glaucoma Detection.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-assisted diagnosis of neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a systematic review from optic neuritis to papilledema.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Deriving OCT-Equivalent Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps from Fundus Photographs with Deep Learning Improves Glaucoma Diagnosis.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a deep learning (DL) model using retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) maps from OCT scans can detect glaucoma, defined by functional visual field (VF) impairment, more accurately than a DL model using disc photos (DPs). A secondary objective was to assess the diagnostic performance of these DL models across demographic groups (race, sex, and ethnicity). Design: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary glaucoma center utilizing OCT and DP datasets collected between 2011 and 2022. Participants: Out of the 16 936 DP and OCT image sets, patients with Cirrus OCT images with a quality score ≥6 of 10 and reliable 24-2 Humphrey VF tests (fixation loss ≤33%, false-negative rate ≤20%, false-positive rate ≤20%), taken within 30 days of OCT, were included. Disc photos were obtained within 6 months of OCT. Data were randomly selected for training and testing of the DL models. Testing: Development of DL models utilizing either OCT RNFLT maps or DPs to detect glaucoma based on VF-defined functional impairment. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) for glaucoma detection, comparing the OCT-based DL model with the DP-based model. The secondary outcome was the AUC across demographic groups. Results: The OCT-based DL model achieved an AUC of 0.90, significantly outperforming the DP-based model (AUC = 0.86, Conclusions: When glaucoma diagnosis was based on functional deficit, the OCT-based DL model offered greater accuracy in detecting glaucoma than the DP-based model, likely due to its use of objective and quantitative RNFLT measurements. This work supports the use of OCT-based DL models for glaucoma detection, while observed demographic disparities underscore the need for equitable datasets to ensure fair DL-driven glaucoma diagnosis across populations. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.