ArticleOphthalmology science
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Disproportionately Impacts Distressed Communities Near a Northeastern Academic Center.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mortality in neovascular glaucoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the associations between social determinants of health (SDoH) and the progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Design: Secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study. Participants: We extracted data from electronic medical records of individuals at the Yale Eye Center or Dana Eye Clinic, ages ≥18 years, who had a documented diagnosis of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) at their first recorded (index) ophthalmology visit within the study period. Methods: We identified participants with NPDR whose disease progressed to PDR during the study time period. We assigned Distressed Communities Index (DCI) scores using participants' zip codes and created a visualized geographic distribution of scores using ArcGIS. We assessed differences in sociodemographic and health characteristics between participants whose disease progressed to PDR and those whose disease did not progress using 2-sample Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the progression from NPDR to PDR. Results: Among the 1354 participants, 137 (10%) developed PDR within the study's 7-year period. Of the 137, 54% were male, 46% were aged ≥65 years, 35% identified as White or Caucasian, and 34% identified as Black or African American. Those whose disease progressed to PDR had significantly worse DCI scores compared to those whose disease did not progress (mean [standard deviation 64 (26) vs. 58 (27), Conclusions: Participants with disease progression to PDR were more likely to live in disadvantaged areas. Using socioeconomic data and geographic mapping to identify high-risk populations may help health care professionals implement early screening and provide better resources for those at risk of retinal disease progression. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.