Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893581›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Function focused care in hospital among nurses and patients from geriatric and neurology wards: A mixed method process evaluation.

Selma Kok, Elke G E Mathijssen, Lisette Schoonhoven, Carolien Verstraten, Silke F Metzelthin, Nienke Bleijenberg, Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Selma KokJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Elke G E MathijssenJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lisette SchoonhovenUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Carolien VerstratenDiakonessenhuis, Postbus 80250, 3508 TG Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Silke F MetzelthinDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Nienke BleijenbergJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Janneke M de Man-van GinkelAcademic Nursing, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Function Focused Care is a promising approach stimulating physical activity of patients admitted to hospital. In studying the effectiveness, patients receiving Function Focused Care in Hospital were admitted 3.3 days shorter than patients receiving usual care. However, no differences were found in functional status. Process evaluations alongside an effect studies create an understanding implementation fidelity, of mechanisms of impact, contextual factors. Objective: to gain insight into the experiences of nurses and patients, and to give insight into implementation fidelity, mechanisms of impact, and contextual factors while implementing Function Focused Care in Hospital on geriatric and neurologic hospital wards. Design: convergent parallel mixed-methods study, alongside a stepped wedge clinical trial. Settings: four hospital wards of two Dutch hospitals. Participants: nurses, nursing students and care assistants ( Methods: Data for the process evaluation was collected before the implementation of Function Focused Care in Hospital (T0), directly after implementation (T1), and four months after implementation (T2). Data was obtained from patient interviews, focus group interviews with nurses, questionnaires, observations, screening of electronic patients' records, and logbook notes. For the qualitative data thematic analyses and for quantitative data descriptive statistics were used. The results of these analyses were synthesized into overarching findings. Results: Findings from the observations showed the care delivery according to the Function Focused Care in Hospital principles increased from 60 % in the control condition to 75 % in the intervention condition. Moreover, nurses stated that patients were only assisted when needed and nurses often asked about their abilities to perform ADL and then encouraged them to do as much as they could themselves. Nevertheless, patients don't recognize Function Focused Care in Hospital. The results suggest that the implementation fidelity was influenced by different working mechanisms and contextual factors which led to different experiences from nurses, coaches and patients in promoting patient engagement and functional independence. The synthesized findings show that lessons can be learned with regards to continuity of the care provided in the interprofessional collaboration, the challenge in providing personalized care given the current time constraints, the phenomenon of being unconscious incompetent observed in the nurses, and difficulties in demonstrating nursing leadership and autonomy. Conclusions: Implementation of Function Focused Care in Hospital improved care delivery but highlighted challenges in personalized care, interprofessional collaboration, and nursing leadership, influenced by various contextual factors and working mechanisms. Registration: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/24287 (date of first recruitment: 05-02-2016).

Indexed as

Activities of daily living [MeSH]Functional declineFunction focused careHospitals [MeSH]Length of stay [MeSH]MobilityNursing care [MeSH]Nursing staff, Hospital [MeSH]Patient-centered care [MeSH]Process evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40893581
PMCPMC12391254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.