Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893563›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Influence of preprocessing of stimulated Raman scattering images on the performance of deep neural networks for detecting cancer tissue.

Andreas Weber, Kathrin Enderle-Ammour, Karl-Moritz Schröder, Marc C Metzger, Leonard Simon Brandenburg, Jürgen Beck, Jakob Straehle, David Steybe, Mohamed Hassan, Severin Schmid and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andreas WeberInstitute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Kathrin Enderle-AmmourInstitute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Karl-Moritz SchröderInstitute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marc C MetzgerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Leonard Simon BrandenburgDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jürgen BeckCenter for Advanced Surgical Tissue Analysis (CAST), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jakob StraehleCenter for Advanced Surgical Tissue Analysis (CAST), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
David SteybeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Mohamed HassanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Severin SchmidDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Birte OhmDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin WernerInstitute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Bernward PasslickDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Rainer SchmelzeisenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Uyen-Thao Le *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter Bronsert *Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Images obtained from stimulated Raman scattering can be used to identify histomorphologically relevant information intraoperatively. In order to leverage deep learning algorithms for distinguishing tumoral and non-tumoral tissue, data preprocessing remains a crucial task and may affect the classification performance. To date, the effect of different preprocessing techniques on deep learning algorithm performance is unclear. This study aims to make a contribution to closing this knowledge gap. Methods: To investigate the influence of different preprocessing techniques of images obtained from stimulated Raman scattering, six deep learning architectures (VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2, Xception, ConvNeXt and Vision Transformer) and five different preprocessing procedures were compared. For this, annotated datasets comprising 542 images of tissue samples obtained from patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma were used for network training. Each network was trained five times for 40 epochs. Performance metrics balanced accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score were recorded. Class activation and attention maps were used to highlight on which input pixels a prediction is based. Results: A scaling of the original pixel values of stimulated Raman scattering images to the range [0, 1] yielded a higher and more stable overall classification performance across the neural networks when compared to more sophisticated and computationally expensive methods [ Conclusions: This study shows that preprocessing of pixel values of stimulated Raman scattering images can have a great impact on the performance and the stability of deep learning algorithms when applied for classification of cancer tissue.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)image processingstimulated Raman histology (SRH)Stimulated Raman scattering microscopy (SRS microscopy)

Identifiers

PMID40893563
PMCPMC12397652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.