ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Influence of preprocessing of stimulated Raman scattering images on the performance of deep neural networks for detecting cancer tissue.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Images obtained from stimulated Raman scattering can be used to identify histomorphologically relevant information intraoperatively. In order to leverage deep learning algorithms for distinguishing tumoral and non-tumoral tissue, data preprocessing remains a crucial task and may affect the classification performance. To date, the effect of different preprocessing techniques on deep learning algorithm performance is unclear. This study aims to make a contribution to closing this knowledge gap. Methods: To investigate the influence of different preprocessing techniques of images obtained from stimulated Raman scattering, six deep learning architectures (VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2, Xception, ConvNeXt and Vision Transformer) and five different preprocessing procedures were compared. For this, annotated datasets comprising 542 images of tissue samples obtained from patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma were used for network training. Each network was trained five times for 40 epochs. Performance metrics balanced accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score were recorded. Class activation and attention maps were used to highlight on which input pixels a prediction is based. Results: A scaling of the original pixel values of stimulated Raman scattering images to the range [0, 1] yielded a higher and more stable overall classification performance across the neural networks when compared to more sophisticated and computationally expensive methods [ Conclusions: This study shows that preprocessing of pixel values of stimulated Raman scattering images can have a great impact on the performance and the stability of deep learning algorithms when applied for classification of cancer tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.