ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Development and validation of models based on clinical and CT features: multivariate analysis for predicting vascular invasion in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a high-risk pathological marker for the evaluation of metastasis and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) prediction of vascular invasion in NSCLC is essential for clinical identification of high-risk patients and development of treatment strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting LVI in NSCLC based on clinical and CT features. Methods: A total of 2,830 patients with NSCLC confirmed by pathology and with complete clinical data were retrospectively enrolled. Among them, 2,663 were negative cases and 167 were positive cases. CT imaging and pathological data of these patients from Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province (center 1) and Anqing Municipal Hospital (center 2), from January 2015 to December 2023, were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 7:3. Additionally, 275 patients from Taizhou Municipal Hospital (center 3) were assigned to the external validation set, including 242 negative cases and 33 positive cases. After screening for potential risk factors by univariate analysis, the selected risk factors were included in the multivariate binary logistic regression model to determine the independent risk factors of LVI in NSCLC to construct a prediction model and draw a nomogram, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to evaluate the predictive power, discrimination, and clinical benefit of the model. Results: A total of 2,830 patients with NSCLC were included, including 1,190 (42.1%) males and 1,640 (57.9%) females, with a mean age of 61.15±10.83 years. Independent risk factors for LVI of NSCLC included the history of smoking, the history of diabetes mellitus, laboratory tumor indices, mixed ground-glass nodule (mGGN) consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR), and vacuole signs. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the training set were 0.836 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.806-0.867], 65.2%, 92.1%, and 63.5%; those for the validation set were 0.803 (95% CI: 0.755-0.852), 71.6%, 82.7%, and 70.9%; and those for the external validation set were 0.845 (95% CI: 0.775-0.916), 70.9%, 87.8%, and 68.6%, respectively. Conclusions: We developed and validated a model for predicting LVI in NSCLC based on clinical and CT image features. The model developed in this study has potential application value in predicting LVI in NSCLC. It provides a new, operable, and non-invasive technique for clinical identification of high-risk patients and may help clinical selection of appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.