Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893549›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Prediction of weaning outcomes from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients based on the combination of ultrasound parameters of the heart, lung, and diaphragm: a prospective observational cohort study.

Qian Zhou, Ying Xu, Jun Chen, Qin Gu, Wentao Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian Zhou *Department of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Ying Xu *Intensive Care Unit, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qin GuIntensive Care Unit, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Wentao KongDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postextubation distress in critically ill patients with successful spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) is unfavorable for prognosis. This study aimed to determine whether the combined application of multimodal ultrasound parameters of the heart, lung, and diaphragm can predict the mechanical ventilation weaning outcome among critically ill patients. Methods: From December 2022 to December 2023, a total of 74 patients (aged over 18 years old) mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours and prepared for an SBT were selected from the Department of Critical Care Unit, Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. Patients who met the criteria for weaning were prepared to undergo a 30-minute SBT, during which the heart, lungs, and diaphragm of the patients were examined via ultrasound. According to the weaning outcomes, patients were divided into a success group and a failure group. Ultrasound parameters with statistical significance in univariate analysis were incorporated into a binary logistic regression model to identify the independent influencing factors of weaning outcomes. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for statistical analysis. Results: Out of the 74 included patients, 23 failed weaning. There were significant differences in diaphragm excursion (DE), diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF), bilateral lung ultrasound score (LUS), total LUS, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the success and failure groups (P<0.05). The predictive performance of individual ultrasound parameters was as follows: LVEF achieved an AUC of 0.742 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.642-0.842; P<0.001], with optimal thresholds of 58.05% (sensitivity: 76.5%; specificity: 69.6%); LUS achieved an AUC of 0.837 (95% CI: 0.738-0.936; P<0.001), with an 80.4% sensitivity and 82.6% specificity at a cutoff value of 17.50. DE yielded an AUC of 0.895 (95% CI: 0.821-0.969; P<0.001), with an 82.4% sensitivity and a 95.7% specificity at a cutoff value of 1.205 cm; DTF reached an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.827-0.965; P<0.001), with a 68.6% sensitivity and a 100% specificity at a cutoff value of 22.75%. A composite model integrating LVEF, LUS, DE, and DTF achieved an AUC of 0.951 (95% CI: 0.907-0.996; P<0.001), with an 88.2% sensitivity and a 95.7% specificity. Conclusions: Ultrasound parameters of the heart, lungs, and diaphragm provide critical information on cardiopulmonary and diaphragmatic function during SBT. Weaning failure is more common when LUS is increased and LVEF, DE, and DTF are decreased. The combination of these three aspects can improve the accuracy of predicting weaning outcomes.

Indexed as

diaphragmechocardiographylung ultrasoundMechanical ventilationweaning

Identifiers

PMID40893549
PMCPMC12397658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.