ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Clinical and computed tomography characteristics of high-risk periampullary diverticulum.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) is a common acquired extraluminal outpouching of duodenal mucosa and is often clinically overlooked. When complicated by biliary-pancreatic stones or inflammation, PAD may lead to severe biliary-pancreatic complications. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is currently regarded as the gold standard for PAD diagnosis, its invasive nature and other limitations have led to computed tomography (CT) being increasingly preferred as the first-line imaging modality. However, the correlation between imaging features and clinical manifestations remains unclear for high-risk PAD (HRPAD), defined as PAD associated with cholelithiasis and biliary-pancreatic inflammation. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the clinical and CT characteristics of HRPAD. Methods: The data of 260 patients with HRPAD and 288 patients with non-high-risk PAD (N-HRPAD) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans between January 2018 and May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and CT features were compared between the groups. Independent factors for diagnosing HRPAD were identified through binary logistic regression analysis. Additionally, an external validation cohort comprising 150 patients from another center was used to test the predictive efficiency of the model. Results: Patients with HRPAD were significantly older than those with N-HRPAD, with an average age of 72±10 and 68±11 years, respectively (P<0.001). Additionally, they exhibited a higher proportion of larger diverticula (>1.95 cm: 65.38% Conclusions: Patients with HRPAD and those with N-HRPAD exhibited different clinical and imaging characteristics. A thorough understanding of these differences may facilitate early identification of HRPAD and timely treatment interventions, which would reduce complications related to biliary-pancreatic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.