ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Classification of mitral regurgitation in echocardiography based on deep learning methods.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The classification of mitral regurgitation (MR) based on echocardiography is highly dependent on the expertise of specialized physicians and is often time-consuming. This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision-making system to improve the accuracy and efficiency of MR classification. Methods: We utilized 754 echocardiography videos from 266 subjects to develop an MR classification model. The dataset included 179 apical two-chamber (A2C), 206 apical three-chamber (A3C), and 369 apical four-chamber (A4C) view videos. A deep learning neural network, named ARMF-Net, was designed to classify MR into four types: normal mitral valve function (NM), degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR). ARMF-Net incorporates three-dimensional (3D) convolutional residual modules, a multi-attention mechanism, and auxiliary feature fusion based on the segmentation results of the left atrium and left ventricle. The dataset was split into 639 videos for training and validation, with 115 videos reserved as an independent test set. Model performance was evaluated using precision and F1-score metrics. Results: At the video level, ARMF-Net achieved an overall precision of 0.93 on the test dataset. The precision for DMR, AFMR, VFMR, and NM was 0.886, 0.81, 1, and 1, respectively. At the participant level, the highest precision was 0.961, with precision values of 1.0, 1.0, 0.846, and 1.0 for DMR, AFMR, VFMR, and NM, respectively. The model can make classifications within seconds, significantly reducing the time and labor required for diagnosis. Conclusions: The proposed model can identify NM and three types of MR in echocardiography videos, providing a method for the automated auxiliary analysis and rapid screening of echocardiogram images in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.