ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Evaluation of myocardial structure and function in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy via cardiovascular magnetic resonance: regional distribution and sex differences.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although hypertrophy and fibrosis have been identified as contributors to mechanical dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), their regional distribution and sex differences remain inadequately characterized in those with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). This study aimed to evaluate the determinants of myocardial strain deterioration across different regions and sexes of patients with HOCM through use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included 102 patients with HOCM who underwent 3.0-T CMR. Global (G) and reginal left ventricular (LV) myocardial peak-strain parameters, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS), were derived via CMR-FT. Structural metrics including LV wall thickness (WT), hypertrophic distribution, late gadolinium enhancement percentage (LGE%), and extracellular volume fraction (ECV%) were comprehensively assessed. Bivariate correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent associations and interaction effects of hypertrophic regions and sex on strain indices. Results: Strain indices exhibited stronger correlations with hypertrophy as compared to fibrosis markers, with correlation coefficients of GLS, GCS, and GRS of -0.72, -0.58, and 0.55, respectively, while mean WT had stronger correlations than did LGE%, at -0.56, -0.55, and 0.51, respectively. Mean WT demonstrated the strongest correlation with GLS, outperforming max WT, hypertrophic segment count, and WT variation. Mean WT emerged as the strongest independent predictor of global strain (GLS: B=0.79; GCS: B=0.54; GRS: B=-1.38; all P values <0.001). ECV% was also independently associated with GLS (B=0.25) and GCS (B=0.16), while WT variation was associated with GCS (B=5.49) (all P values <0.05). Interaction analyses revealed significantly greater strain impairment in female patients and apical regions as WT increased (all P values <0.001). Conclusions: Mean WT emerged as the most robust structural determinant of myocardial strain impairment in patients with HOCM, surpassing other hypertrophic characteristics and fibrosis surrogates. Notably, functional deterioration was most prominent in the apical regions and among female patients. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating sex-specific and region-specific hypertrophic patterns into individualized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.