Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893461›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in electrochemistry2022

Advantages of imprinted polymer electrodes for electrochemical pathogen detection.

Yaniv Shlosberg, Lior Sepunaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in electrochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yaniv ShlosbergDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States.
Lior SepunaruDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States.

Funding

Bioelectrochemistry at the Nanoscale: Fundamentals and ApplicationsR35GM142920 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SEPUNARU, LIOR · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid, reliable, and cost-effective pathogen detection sensors are reshaping modern biomedical devices to a competent form for health care applications. Current approaches rely on microscopy, spectroscopy, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and electrochemistry. The latter is an intriguing way of using electricity to drive a (bio)chemical reaction, the electronic read-out of which informs on the state of infection. Specifically, a recent electrochemical platform for pathogenic detection utilizes imprinted electrodes to detect species with high specificity based on their spatial 3D "fingerprint." In this mini-review, we describe different compositions and techniques for fabricating imprinted electrodes that target various species of bacteria and viruses. We elaborate on the possible electrochemical pathogen detection methods, compare their performance with non-electrochemical methods, and emphasize the benefit of coupling electrochemistry with other established techniques. As a showcase, we contrast the ability of electrochemical DNA biosensors and imprinted electrodes to detect Zika and SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Indexed as

BiosensorsElectrochemical pathogen detectionImprinting polymer electrodesSpectroelectrochemistry

Identifiers

PMID40893461
PMCPMC12392273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.