Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893446›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Uptake, positivity, and equity of online postal self-sampling for chlamydia testing in England: a retrospective cohort study.

Alison Howarth, Ana Harb, Hamish Mohammed, Fiona Burns, Claudia Estcourt, Sonja C M Bloch, Andrew Copas, Jonathan O'Sullivan, Tamilore Sonubi, Oliver Stirrup and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Decreased chlamydia notifications in six European Union/European Economic Area countries and England, 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alison HowarthUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
Ana HarbBlood Safety, Hepatitis, STIs and HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK.
Hamish MohammedUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
Fiona BurnsUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
Claudia EstcourtSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Sonja C M BlochUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
Andrew CopasUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
Jonathan O'SullivanIslington Council, 222 Upper Street, London, N1 1XR, UK.
Tamilore SonubiBlood Safety, Hepatitis, STIs and HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK.
Oliver StirrupUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
Anna TostevinUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
John SaundersUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.
Jo GibbsUCL Institute for Global Health, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chlamydia is the most commonly reported sexually transmitted infection (STI) in Europe and untreated chlamydia is associated with poor health outcomes. Online postal self-sampling enables people to test for STIs including chlamydia without having to visit a health-care provider, but the extent to which the addition of this mode of testing in England has impacted access to testing in different populations is unclear. In England, there is national-level surveillance data enabling identification of the factors associated with use of online postal self-sampling (OPSS) for chlamydia testing. The aim of this analysis was to determine the change in chlamydia testing, chlamydia positivity, and test location as a result of the introduction of OPSS, and to determine socio-demographic factors associated with uptake of OPSS services compared to testing in-person. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysing data on all publicly funded chlamydia tests between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2022 in England using two pseudonymised national surveillance systems (GUMCAD STI Surveillance System and CTAD Chlamydia Surveillance System) for STIs. We conducted a descriptive analysis of 25,171,919 chlamydia tests to establish the uptake and positivity of chlamydia tests by testing mode and gender over time. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression to examine associations of uptake of testing and positivity of tests with sociodemographic characteristics and testing by OPSS or a different mode. Findings: The overall number of chlamydia tests/quarter (OPSS and in-person) gradually increased over time until 2019 (884,843 tests/quarter in quarter 1) and then declined in early 2020 (376,118 in quarter 2) and had not returned to 2019 levels by the end of 2022 (715,166 in quarter 4). During this time, the proportion of OPSS testing completed through OPSS increased from 2.6% (88,144/3,433,987) in 2015 to 38.4% (1,168,828/2,972,226) in 2022. Women were less likely than men to use OPSS compared to all available in-person testing (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.75)). Those aged 20-24 were more likely to use OPSS than 15-19-year-olds (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.55-1.56) and use of OPSS then decreased with increasing age. People in the most deprived areas were the least likely to use OPSS (aORs 1.18-1.28 for index of multiple deprivation quintile groups 2-5 vs 1). People were less likely to test positive using OPSS compared to in-person testing (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.87-0.88). Between 2015 and 2022 OPSS chlamydia test-positivity decreased from 9.3% (2551/27,557) to 7.5% (34,050/454,596) in men and 7.4% (4458/60,367) to 6.1% (43,088/702,867) in women. During the same period, chlamydia test-positivity in sexual health services increased from 8.2% (57,139/692,873) to 10.6% (43,061/406,161) in men and 6.4% (51,080/797,143) to 7.9% (33,292/420,760) in women. Interpretation: We have found changes in access to care, with a shift towards testing via OPSS, and variations in who tests where and differences in positivity by testing mode and gender. Further research is needed to ensure available testing pathways meet the needs of all populations. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Indexed as

ChlamydiaDigital healthOnline STI testingPublic healthSTIsSTI service provision

Identifiers

PMID40893446
PMCPMC12392761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.