Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893436›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2025

Quantifying compatibility mechanisms in traditional Chinese medicine with interpretable graph neural networks.

Jingqi Zeng, Xiaobin Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingqi ZengSchool of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Xiaobin JiaSchool of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) features complex compatibility mechanisms involving multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway interactions. This study presents an interpretable graph artificial intelligence (GraphAI) framework to quantify such mechanisms in Chinese herbal formulas (CHFs). A multidimensional TCM knowledge graph (TCM-MKG; https://zenodo.org/records/13763953) was constructed, integrating seven standardized modules: TCM terminology, Chinese patent medicines (CPMs), Chinese herbal pieces (CHPs), pharmacognostic origins (POs), chemical compounds, biological targets, and diseases. A neighbor-diffusion strategy was used to address the sparsity of compound-target associations, increasing target coverage from 12.0% to 98.7%. Graph neural networks (GNNs) with attention mechanisms were applied to 6,080 CHFs, modeled as graphs with CHPs as nodes. To embed domain-specific semantics, virtual nodes medicinal properties, i.e., therapeutic nature, flavor, and meridian tropism, were introduced, enabling interpretable modeling of inter-CHP relationships. The model quantitatively captured classical compatibility roles such as "monarch-minister-assistant-guide," and uncovered TCM etiological types derived from diagnostic and efficacy patterns. Model validation using 215 CHFs used for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) management highlighted

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCompatibility mechanismCoronavirus disease 2019Graph neural networksKnowledge graphTraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID40893436
PMCPMC12398817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.