ArticleBMC digital health2025
Acceptability of wearable technology for the early detection of dementia-causing diseases: perspectives from the CODEC II cohort.
Article in BMC digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07051408 (Predictors Of Cognitive Decline In Attenders Of Essex Memory Clinic From Digital Devices Using Classical Statistical Methods, Machine Learning And Disease Progression Modelling), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Predictors Of Cognitive Decline In Attenders Of Essex Memory Clinic From Digital Devices Using Classical Statistical Methods, Machine Learning And Disease Progression Modelling
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From brain waves to heartbeats: Exploring the combined role of electroencephalography and heart-rate variability in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and management.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Review
- Passive digital health technologies for Alzheimer's disease screening and diagnosis: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond single-modality screening: toward an EEG-IoT dual-stream framework for early detection of mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Acceptance of a Wearable Activity Monitor in Persons With Stroke: Usability Study.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global prevalence of dementia is increasing exponentially. Early detection of dementia-causing diseases could support therapeutic intervention to decelerate disease progression. Wearable digital technologies can be used to identify early signs of such diseases and remotely monitor disease progression. However, technologies must be acceptable to users. This study explored the perspectives of participants on the acceptability of various wearable technologies for early detection. Method: Participants from the Cognitive Decline using Digital Devices (CODEC-II) cohort used four different wearables (smartwatch, electroencephalographic [EEG] headband, active and passive smartphone apps) for two weeks every three months over a year. A subgroup participated in semi structured interviews after two weeks to discuss their experiences and acceptance of the devices. Data was analysed using the framework analysis approach, aided by N-Vivo (v14.23.2). Results: Twenty-one participants were interviewed, including individuals with subjective cognitive decline ( Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of using an inclusive design approach to meet users' needs and support digital inclusivity, and an effective communication strategy to increase transparency and reduce data disclosure concerns. Future research is needed to explore the effectiveness of implementing current recommendations to support digital health equity and codesign a communication strategy with users to ensure the information is understandable. Trial registration: CODEC-II was retrospectively registered as a clinical trial under the registry ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT07051408, date of registration: 3rd June 2025). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-025-00191-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.