Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893385›Full record

ArticleBMC digital health2025

Acceptability of wearable technology for the early detection of dementia-causing diseases: perspectives from the CODEC II cohort.

Sarah Wilson, Emily Beswick, Rachel Morrell, Sharandeep Bhogal, Clare Tolley, Tim Whitfield, Kieran Wing, Riona Mc Ardle, Nehal Hassan, Zuzana Walker and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07051408 (Predictors Of Cognitive Decline In Attenders Of Essex Memory Clinic From Digital Devices Using Classical Statistical Methods, Machine Learning And Disease Progression Modelling), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07051408 active not recruitingnot on this map

Predictors Of Cognitive Decline In Attenders Of Essex Memory Clinic From Digital Devices Using Classical Statistical Methods, Machine Learning And Disease Progression Modelling

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2022 to 2030Enrolled135ConditionsDementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah WilsonSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Emily BeswickTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Rachel MorrellUniversity College London, London, UK.
Sharandeep BhogalUniversity College London, London, UK.
Clare TolleySchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Tim WhitfieldUniversity College London, London, UK.
Kieran WingUniversity College London, London, UK.
Riona Mc ArdleTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Nehal HassanSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Zuzana WalkerUniversity College London, London, UK.
Sarah SlightSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global prevalence of dementia is increasing exponentially. Early detection of dementia-causing diseases could support therapeutic intervention to decelerate disease progression. Wearable digital technologies can be used to identify early signs of such diseases and remotely monitor disease progression. However, technologies must be acceptable to users. This study explored the perspectives of participants on the acceptability of various wearable technologies for early detection. Method: Participants from the Cognitive Decline using Digital Devices (CODEC-II) cohort used four different wearables (smartwatch, electroencephalographic [EEG] headband, active and passive smartphone apps) for two weeks every three months over a year. A subgroup participated in semi structured interviews after two weeks to discuss their experiences and acceptance of the devices. Data was analysed using the framework analysis approach, aided by N-Vivo (v14.23.2). Results: Twenty-one participants were interviewed, including individuals with subjective cognitive decline ( Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of using an inclusive design approach to meet users' needs and support digital inclusivity, and an effective communication strategy to increase transparency and reduce data disclosure concerns. Future research is needed to explore the effectiveness of implementing current recommendations to support digital health equity and codesign a communication strategy with users to ensure the information is understandable. Trial registration: CODEC-II was retrospectively registered as a clinical trial under the registry ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT07051408, date of registration: 3rd June 2025). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-025-00191-3.

Indexed as

DementiaDigital health technologiesEarly detectionQualitativeWearable technologies

Identifiers

PMID40893385
PMCPMC12394386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.