Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893269›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Sequential Extraction and

Monwadee Aiamsung, Lueacha Tabtimmai, Pinchuta Bunphueak, Chanikan Sonklin, Awat Wisetsai, Kiattawee Choowongkomon, Saranya Sedtananun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monwadee AiamsungDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.
Lueacha TabtimmaiDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-9030
Pinchuta BunphueakDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.
Chanikan SonklinAgro-Industrial Research Center, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-5796
Awat WisetsaiDepartment of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-5501
Kiattawee ChoowongkomonDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-7859
Saranya SedtananunDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-0568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mung bean meal (MBM) is a byproduct of vermicelli production that is usually discarded as waste but has been shown to be a valuable source of functional food ingredients. This study focused on extracting polysaccharides from MBM, analyzing the structures of the two fractions, and assessing their biological activities

Identifiers

PMID40893269
PMCPMC12392031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.