ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025
Optimizing Nutrition Education in a Dedicated Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the Training Gap in Diet and Nutrition Counseling for IBD-Related Pain.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently ask their providers for nutritional or dietary recommendations; however, providers are limited in both time and knowledge to adequately address their questions. In this single-center study, we sought to improve provider experiences with nutrition counseling for patients seen in a dedicated IBD clinic. Methods: To understand the current state, providers, including gastroenterology fellows, attendings, and advanced practice providers were surveyed regarding their experiences with nutritional recommendations in a dedicated IBD clinic. Following the pre-intervention survey, we worked with registered dieticians on how to address key concerns and developed an informational handout based upon current guidelines. After displaying handouts in clinical workspaces for 5 weeks, providers were surveyed again to evaluate their response. Results: All 22 respondents (100%) in the pre-intervention survey either agreed or strongly agreed that IBD patients have unique nutritional requirements. A majority (72%) strongly agreed that the clinic would benefit from more access to dieticians. Additionally, 41% of providers either strongly disagreed or disagreed that they had enough time to address nutritional concerns. Post-intervention, 57% of respondents (8/14) reported that they found the handouts helpful. A significant number of providers reported improvement in their comfort level discussing nutrition and dietary recommendations with IBD patients, with tmean Likert score increasing from 3.5 to 4.1 ( Conclusion: In this quality improvement study, we identified key issues preventing providers from addressing patient desire for nutritional counseling and developed a novel awareness campaign that significantly improved provider confidence in discussing nutritional recommendations with their IBD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.