Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893179›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025

Optimizing Nutrition Education in a Dedicated Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic.

Thomas W Fredrick, June Tome, Camille A Kezer, Krista R Kerlinske, Lindsey E Sefried, Sunanda V Kane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas W FredrickDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-1574
June TomeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-1695
Camille A KezerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8332-3312
Krista R KerlinskeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Lindsey E SefriedDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Sunanda V KaneDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-4242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently ask their providers for nutritional or dietary recommendations; however, providers are limited in both time and knowledge to adequately address their questions. In this single-center study, we sought to improve provider experiences with nutrition counseling for patients seen in a dedicated IBD clinic. Methods: To understand the current state, providers, including gastroenterology fellows, attendings, and advanced practice providers were surveyed regarding their experiences with nutritional recommendations in a dedicated IBD clinic. Following the pre-intervention survey, we worked with registered dieticians on how to address key concerns and developed an informational handout based upon current guidelines. After displaying handouts in clinical workspaces for 5 weeks, providers were surveyed again to evaluate their response. Results: All 22 respondents (100%) in the pre-intervention survey either agreed or strongly agreed that IBD patients have unique nutritional requirements. A majority (72%) strongly agreed that the clinic would benefit from more access to dieticians. Additionally, 41% of providers either strongly disagreed or disagreed that they had enough time to address nutritional concerns. Post-intervention, 57% of respondents (8/14) reported that they found the handouts helpful. A significant number of providers reported improvement in their comfort level discussing nutrition and dietary recommendations with IBD patients, with tmean Likert score increasing from 3.5 to 4.1 ( Conclusion: In this quality improvement study, we identified key issues preventing providers from addressing patient desire for nutritional counseling and developed a novel awareness campaign that significantly improved provider confidence in discussing nutritional recommendations with their IBD patients.

Indexed as

and nutritiondietfoodinflammatory bowel diseasesnutritional statusquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40893179
PMCPMC12393898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.