Review3 Biotech2025
Evolving therapeutic strategies in glioblastoma: traditional approaches and novel interventions.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temozolomide and ruxolitinib combination modulates miRNA-associated regulatory networks in glioblastoma stem cells.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- The promising role of cathepsins as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in glioblastoma.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Construction of an actin cytoskeleton-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and therapeutic response in glioblastoma: based on machine learning.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Natural killer cell dysfunction in glioma: from immune evasion to immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From Deep-Sea Natural Product to Optimized Therapeutics: Computational Design of Marizomib Analogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Pyroptosis in cancer therapy: a double-edged sword for immune activation and tumor progression.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults and is characterized by rapid growth, diffuse infiltration, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review explores pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic advancements of GBM. GBM is highly heterogeneous and can be classified into molecular subtypes based on genetic and epigenetic alterations, influencing patient prognosis and treatment response. Despite advances in surgical techniques, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, survival remains limited, with a median of 15-18 months. Emerging therapeutic strategies, including immunotherapy, tumor treatment, oncolytic virotherapy, and nanotechnology-based drug delivery, are under investigation to increase treatment efficacy. Immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T-cell therapy, has potential but faces challenges due to the immunosuppressive microenvironment of GBM. Oncolytic viruses and personalized vaccines aim to trigger antitumor immune responses, whereas nanotechnology-based approaches enhance drug delivery across the blood‒brain barrier (BBB). This review highlights the urgent need for multimodal strategies that integrate novel therapies with existing standards to improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on overcoming treatment resistance, leveraging molecular profiling for personalized medicine, and exploring innovative drug delivery systems. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-025-04493-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.