ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2025
BAYESIAN DIFFERENTIAL CAUSAL DIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPHS FOR OBSERVATIONAL ZERO-INFLATED COUNTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO TWO-SAMPLE SINGLE-CELL DATA.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CONSTRUCTING GENE REGULATORY NETWORK USING CHATTERJEE'S RANK CORRELATION WITH SINGLE-CELL TRANSCRIPTOMIC DATA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- BAYESIAN DIFFERENTIAL CAUSAL DIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPHS FOR OBSERVATIONAL ZERO-INFLATED COUNTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO TWO-SAMPLE SINGLE-CELL DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Observational zero-inflated count data arise in a wide range of areas such as genomics. One of the common research questions is to identify causal relationships by learning the structure of a sparse directed acyclic graph (DAG). While structure learning of DAGs has been an active research area, existing methods do not adequately account for excessive zeros and therefore are not suitable for modeling zero-inflated count data. Moreover, it is often interesting to study differences in the causal networks for data collected from two experimental groups (control vs treatment). To explicitly account for zero-inflation and identify differential causal networks, we propose a novel Bayesian differential zero-inflated negative binomial DAG (DAG0) model. We prove that the causal relationships under the proposed DAG0 are fully identifiable from purely observational, cross-sectional data, using a general proof technique that is applicable beyond the proposed model. Bayesian inference based on parallel-tempered Markov chain Monte Carlo is developed to efficiently explore the multi-modal posterior landscape. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed DAG0 by comparing it with state-of-the-art alternative methods through extensive simulations. An application in a single-cell RNA-sequencing dataset generated under two experimental groups finds some interesting results that appear to be consistent with existing knowledge. A user-friendly R package that implements DAG0 is available at https://github.com/junsoukchoi/BayesDAG0.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.