Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893137›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2025

BAYESIAN DIFFERENTIAL CAUSAL DIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPHS FOR OBSERVATIONAL ZERO-INFLATED COUNTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO TWO-SAMPLE SINGLE-CELL DATA.

Junsouk Choi, Robert S Chapkin, Yang Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junsouk ChoiDepartment of Statistics, Korea University.
Robert S ChapkinDepartment of Nutrition, Texas A&M University.
Yang NiDepartment of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin.

Funding

Bayesian Differential Causal Network and Clustering Methods for Single-Cell Data (R01GM148974)R01GM148974 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI NI, YANG · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM148974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational zero-inflated count data arise in a wide range of areas such as genomics. One of the common research questions is to identify causal relationships by learning the structure of a sparse directed acyclic graph (DAG). While structure learning of DAGs has been an active research area, existing methods do not adequately account for excessive zeros and therefore are not suitable for modeling zero-inflated count data. Moreover, it is often interesting to study differences in the causal networks for data collected from two experimental groups (control vs treatment). To explicitly account for zero-inflation and identify differential causal networks, we propose a novel Bayesian differential zero-inflated negative binomial DAG (DAG0) model. We prove that the causal relationships under the proposed DAG0 are fully identifiable from purely observational, cross-sectional data, using a general proof technique that is applicable beyond the proposed model. Bayesian inference based on parallel-tempered Markov chain Monte Carlo is developed to efficiently explore the multi-modal posterior landscape. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed DAG0 by comparing it with state-of-the-art alternative methods through extensive simulations. An application in a single-cell RNA-sequencing dataset generated under two experimental groups finds some interesting results that appear to be consistent with existing knowledge. A user-friendly R package that implements DAG0 is available at https://github.com/junsoukchoi/BayesDAG0.git.

Indexed as

Bayesian networkCausal identifiabilityDifferential networkParallel temperingSingle-cell RNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40893137
PMCPMC12395422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.