ArticleJMIR AI2025
AI-Driven Tacrolimus Dosing in Transplant Care: Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical Models to Optimize Tacrolimus Dosing in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Transforming lung transplantation with artificial intelligence: a narrative review from organ allocation to post-transplant management.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modelling for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressants in Kidney Transplantation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Protocol-constrained AI enhances tacrolimus dosing accuracy in kidney transplant care.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tacrolimus forms the backbone of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation, requiring precise dosing due to its narrow therapeutic range. Maintaining therapeutic tacrolimus levels in the postoperative period is challenging due to diverse patient characteristics, donor organ factors, drug interactions, and evolving perioperative physiology. Objective: The aim of this study is to design a machine learning model to predict the next-day tacrolimus trough concentrations (C0) and guide dosing to prevent persistent under- or overdosing. Methods: We used retrospective data from 1597 adult recipients of kidney and liver transplants at UC San Diego Health to develop a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to predict next-day tacrolimus C0 in an inpatient setting. Predictors included transplant type, demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory parameters, ordered diet, and medications. Permutation feature importance was evaluated for the model. We further implemented a classification task to evaluate the model's ability to identify underdosing, therapeutic dosing, and overdosing. Finally, we generated next-day dose recommendations that would achieve tacrolimus C0 within the target ranges. Results: The LSTM model provided a mean absolute error of 1.880 ng/mL when predicting next-day tacrolimus C0. Top predictive features included the recent tacrolimus C0, tacrolimus doses, transplant organ type, diet, and interactive drugs. When predicting underdosing, therapeutic dosing, and overdosing using a 3-class classification task, the model achieved a microaverage F1-score of 0.653. For dose recommendations, the best clinical outcomes were achieved when the actual total daily dose closely aligned with the model's recommended dose (within 3 mg). Conclusions: Ours is one of the largest studies to apply artificial intelligence to tacrolimus dosing, and our LSTM model effectively predicts tacrolimus C0 and could potentially guide accurate dose recommendations. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the model's performance in real-world dose adjustments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.