ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
In Search of Beautiful Molecules: A Perspective on Generative Modeling for Drug Design.
Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning directed synthesis of fluid ferroelectric materials.Materials horizons · 2026Article
- Multi-objective optimization in the context of generative chemistry.Nature communications · 2026Review
- The impact of reward scalarization and weight scheduling on optimization dynamics in multi-objective molecular design.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence empowers targeted protein degradation: Core technological innovations, multi-scenario applications, and translational prospects.Smart molecules : open access · 2026Review
- MOZAIC: compound growth via in silico reactions and global optimization using Conformational Space Annealing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- ReLink-PyB: an adapted REINVENT-based framework for non-DSM PfDHODH inhibitor discovery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Discovering COJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Integrating machine learning-based molecular design with experimental validation for the discovery of EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- DataXflowGen for GenAI-driven model generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for antimicrobial discovery and optimization.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Generative Chemistry Platform for Small Molecules Targeting RNA: A Case Study for Chemical Optimization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Designing novel linagliptin analogs through combined generative artificial intelligence, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and binding energy estimation for targeting fibroblast activation protein.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Assay2Mol: Large Language Model-based Drug Design Using BioAssay Context.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative modeling with artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers an emerging approach to discover novel, efficacious, and safe drugs by enabling the systematic exploration of chemical space and to design molecules that are synthesizable while also having desirable drug properties. However, despite rapid progress in other industries, GenAI has yet to demonstrate clear and consistent value in prospective drug discovery applications. In this Perspective, we argue that the ultimate goal of generative chemistry is not just to generate "new" or "interesting" molecules, but to generate "beautiful" molecules─those that are therapeutically aligned with the program objectives and bring value beyond traditional approaches. We focus on five essential considerations for the successful applications of GenAI for drug discovery (GADD): 1) chemical synthesizability (accounting for time/cost constraints); 2) favorable ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) properties; 3) desirable target-specific binding to modulate the biological mechanism of interest; 4) the construction of appropriate multiparameter optimization (MPO) functions to drive the GenAI toward the project objectives; and 5) human feedback from experienced drug hunters. Interestingly, defining the beauty of a molecule in a drug discovery program is not always obvious, being context-dependent as data emerge and priorities shift, making the role of expert human input indispensable. While MPO frameworks using complex desirability functions or Pareto optimization can help operationalize multifaceted project objectives, they cannot yet fully capture the nuanced judgment of experienced drug hunters. Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) offers a path to guide the GenAI toward therapeutically aligned molecules, just as RLHF played a pivotal role in training large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, especially in aligning the model's behavior with human expectations. While not responsible for the model's base knowledge, RLHF is essential in shaping how the model responds. In addition to RLHF, future progress in GADD will depend on better property prediction models and explainable systems that provide insights to expert drug hunters. "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder"─for drug discovery, beauty is judged by experienced drug hunters and clinical success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.