Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893044›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

In Search of Beautiful Molecules: A Perspective on Generative Modeling for Drug Design.

Remco L van den Broek, Shivam Patel, Gerard J P van Westen, Willem Jespers, Woody Sherman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Discovering COJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assay2Mol: Large Language Model-based Drug Design Using BioAssay Context.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Remco L van den BroekDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden 2333CC, the Netherlands.
Shivam PatelPsivant Therapeutics, 451 D Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210, United States.
Gerard J P van WestenDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden 2333CC, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-1817
Willem JespersDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden 2333CC, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-9220
Woody ShermanPsivant Therapeutics, 451 D Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-1376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative modeling with artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers an emerging approach to discover novel, efficacious, and safe drugs by enabling the systematic exploration of chemical space and to design molecules that are synthesizable while also having desirable drug properties. However, despite rapid progress in other industries, GenAI has yet to demonstrate clear and consistent value in prospective drug discovery applications. In this Perspective, we argue that the ultimate goal of generative chemistry is not just to generate "new" or "interesting" molecules, but to generate "beautiful" molecules─those that are therapeutically aligned with the program objectives and bring value beyond traditional approaches. We focus on five essential considerations for the successful applications of GenAI for drug discovery (GADD): 1) chemical synthesizability (accounting for time/cost constraints); 2) favorable ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) properties; 3) desirable target-specific binding to modulate the biological mechanism of interest; 4) the construction of appropriate multiparameter optimization (MPO) functions to drive the GenAI toward the project objectives; and 5) human feedback from experienced drug hunters. Interestingly, defining the beauty of a molecule in a drug discovery program is not always obvious, being context-dependent as data emerge and priorities shift, making the role of expert human input indispensable. While MPO frameworks using complex desirability functions or Pareto optimization can help operationalize multifaceted project objectives, they cannot yet fully capture the nuanced judgment of experienced drug hunters. Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) offers a path to guide the GenAI toward therapeutically aligned molecules, just as RLHF played a pivotal role in training large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, especially in aligning the model's behavior with human expectations. While not responsible for the model's base knowledge, RLHF is essential in shaping how the model responds. In addition to RLHF, future progress in GADD will depend on better property prediction models and explainable systems that provide insights to expert drug hunters. "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder"─for drug discovery, beauty is judged by experienced drug hunters and clinical success.

Indexed as

Drug DesignArtificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryHumans

Identifiers

PMID40893044
PMCPMC12458704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.