Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893041›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2025

Recurrence rate and mesh bulging are reduced with primary fascial closure in ventral hernia repair: the PROSECO randomized clinical trial.

Mikael Lindmark, Jael Tall, Bahman Darkahi, Johanna Österberg, Karin Strigård, Anders Thorell, Ulf Gunnarsson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mikael LindmarkDepartment of Diagnostic and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1536-4600
Jael TallDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bahman DarkahiDepartment of Surgery, Enköping Hospital, Enköping, Sweden.
Johanna ÖsterbergDepartment of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden.
Karin StrigårdDepartment of Diagnostic and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-9133
Anders ThorellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulf GunnarssonDepartment of Diagnostic and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3806-2114

Funding

The Erling-Persson Foundation # 20190200Umeå University and Västerbotten County Council RV-965797Umeå University and Västerbotten County Council RV-978927Umeå University and Västerbotten County Council RV-979794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair using a bridging technique has shown high rates of hernia site complications. Primary fascial closure before mesh placement has been utilized to address this. This randomized, parallel, double-blind, multicentre controlled trial investigated whether primary fascial closure reduces hernia site complications.

methodsAdults undergoing laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for a midline hernia were randomized to primary fascial closure or bridging. Clinical assessment and the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire were completed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. CT scans were performed pre- and 12 months post-surgery. It was hypothesized that non-resorbable suture closure would reduce complication rates from 30% to 13% at 12 months, requiring 180 patients for 80% power and 95% significance.

resultsOne hundred and ninety-two patients were randomized (97 closure, 95 bridging), with 173 (90%) completing 1-year follow-up. At 12 months, overall hernia site complication rates showed no significant difference clinically (18% versus 20%, P = 0.85) or on CT (25% versus 28%, P = 0.50). However, recurrence and mesh bulging were significantly lower with fascial closure (4% versus 20%, P = 0.006). This group also reported significantly less pain at 12 months.

conclusionAlthough there was no difference in the primary endpoint, fascial closure resulted in significantly lower rates of recurrence and mesh bulging, along with reduced postoperative pain. These findings suggest that primary fascial closure should be recommended alongside intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair in midline hernias.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at the ISRCTN at the start of the trial (ISRCTN51495042).

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopySurgical MeshAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40893041
PMCPMC12404345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.