ArticlePloS one2025
GATmath and GATLc: Comprehensive benchmarks for evaluating Arabic large language models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced artificial intelligence, driving innovation across various applications. Their continued development relies on a deep understanding of their capabilities and limitations. This is achieved primarily through rigorous evaluation based on diverse datasets. However, assessing state-of-the-art models in Arabic remains a formidable challenge due to the scarcity of comprehensive benchmarks. The absence of robust evaluation tools hinders the progress and refinement of Arabic LLMs and limits their potential applications and effectiveness in real-world scenarios. In response, we introduce the GATmath (7k questions) and GATLc (9k questions), two Arabic, large-scale, and multitask reasoning and language understanding benchmarks. Derived from the General Aptitude Test (GAT) examination, each dataset covers multiple categories, demanding skills in reasoning, semantic analysis, language comprehension, and mathematical problem-solving. To the best of our knowledge, our dataset is the first comprehensive and large-scale reasoning dataset specifically tailored to the Arabic language. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation and analysis of seven prominent LLMs on our datasets. Remarkably, even the highest-performing model attained a mere 66.9% and 64.3% accuracy, underscoring the considerable challenge posed by our datasets. This outcome illustrates the intricate nature of the tasks within our datasets and highlights the substantial room for improvement in the realm of Arabic language model development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.