Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892917›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Surrogate optimization of variational quantum circuits.

Erik J Gustafson, Juha Tiihonen, Diana Chamaki, Farshud Sorourifar, J Wayne Mullinax, Andy C Y Li, Filip B Maciejewski, Nicolas P D Sawaya, Jaron T Krogel, David E Bernal Neira and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Surrogate optimization of variational quantum circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erik J GustafsonUniversities Space Research Association, Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-5692
Juha TiihonenDepartment of Physics, Nanoscience Center, University of Jyvaskla, Jyvaskla 40014, Finland.
Diana ChamakiDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Farshud SorourifarUniversities Space Research Association, Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-8658
J Wayne MullinaxKBR Inc, Intelligent Systems Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.ORCID 0000-0001-9402-9442
Andy C Y LiQuantum Division, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510.ORCID 0000-0003-4542-3739
Filip B MaciejewskiUniversities Space Research Association, Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.ORCID 0000-0002-8503-1193
Nicolas P D SawayaAzulene Labs, San Francisco, CA 94115.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-8480
Jaron T KrogelMaterials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830.
David E Bernal NeiraUniversities Space Research Association, Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.ORCID 0000-0002-8308-5016
Norm M TubmanApplied Physics Group, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.

Funding

NASA | Ames Research Center (ARC) NNA16BD14CNASA | Ames Research Center (ARC) Transformational Tools and TechnologyU.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC02-07CH1359U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC05-00OR22725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variational quantum eigensolvers are touted as a near-term algorithm capable of impacting many applications. However, the potential has not yet been realized, with few claims of quantum advantage and high resource estimates, especially due to the need for optimization in the presence of noise. Finding algorithms and methods to improve convergence is important to accelerate the capabilities of near-term hardware for variational quantum eigensolver or more broad applications of hybrid methods in which optimization is required. To this goal, we look to use modern approaches developed in circuit simulations and stochastic classical optimization, which can be combined to form a surrogate optimization approach to quantum circuits. Using an approximate (classical central processing unit/graphical processing unit) state vector simulator as a surrogate model, we efficiently calculate an approximate Hessian, which is passed as input for a quantum processing unit or exact circuit simulator. This method will lend itself well to parallelization across quantum processing units. We demonstrate the capabilities of such an approach with and without sampling noise and a proof-of-principle demonstration on a quantum processing unit utilizing 40 qubits.

Indexed as

electronic structurequantum computingvariational quantum algorithms

Identifiers

PMID40892917
PMCPMC12435291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.