ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Gene regulatory network structure informs the distribution of perturbation effects.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From prior knowledge to data-informed models: a review of Boolean network inference.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Article
- Regulatory network topology and the genetic architecture of gene expression.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Evolution of phenocopying in a dynamical model of developmental trajectories.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Genotype-fitness mapping of adaptive mutants reveals shifting low-dimensional structure across divergent environments.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- The interaction of biological network topology and mutation effects in complex trait evolution.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- A squamous epithelial gene interaction perturbation network index for risk stratification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- AUPRC: a metric for evaluating the performance of in-silico perturbation methods in identifying differentially expressed genes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- AUC-PR is a More Informative Metric for Assessing the Biological Relevance of In Silico Cellular Perturbation Prediction Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Leveraging prior knowledge to infer gene regulatory networks from single-cell RNA-sequencing data.Molecular systems biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) govern many core developmental and biological processes underlying human complex traits. Even with broad-scale efforts to characterize the effects of molecular perturbations and interpret gene coexpression, it remains challenging to infer the architecture of gene regulation in a precise and efficient manner. Key properties of GRNs, like hierarchical structure, modular organization, and sparsity, provide both challenges and opportunities for this objective. Here, we seek to better understand properties of GRNs using a new approach to simulate their structure and model their function. We produce realistic network structures with a novel generating algorithm based on insights from small-world network theory, and we model gene expression regulation using stochastic differential equations formulated to accommodate modeling molecular perturbations. With these tools, we systematically describe the effects of gene knockouts within and across GRNs, finding a subset of networks that recapitulate features of a recent genome-scale perturbation study. With deeper analysis of these exemplar networks, we consider future avenues to map the architecture of gene expression regulation using data from cells in perturbed and unperturbed states, finding that while perturbation data are critical to discover specific regulatory interactions, data from unperturbed cells may be sufficient to reveal regulatory programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.