ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
From injury to outcome: A mixed-methods study of animal-related injuries in a rural district of Tanzania.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Addressing dual health threats: development and pilot of an integrated acute NCD and IPC training programme in Tanzania.BMJ public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnimal-related injuries remain a neglected public health issue in rural Tanzania, exacerbated by limited access to care and varied occupational exposures. While some studies have examined bite management in tertiary hospitals, little is known about the situation at the primary healthcare (PHC) level. This study explored clinical presentations, management and outcomes of animal-related injuries in a rural Tanzanian setting, using Mkinga District as a case study.
methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted in February 2024 across 29 PHC facilities in Mkinga, Tanzania. The quantitative component involved a retrospective audit of animal-related injury records from 2019 to 2023. The qualitative component comprised 10 interviews with facility in-charges to explore clinical decision-making, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS; thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative transcript.
resultsA total of 351 cases were documented. Symptom data were missing in over 70% of records, limiting clinical profiling. Among recorded cases, corticosteroids (55%) and antihistamines (53%) were commonly used, especially for insect and dog bites. Antibiotics were administered in insect stings (26%) and dog bites (23%), and analgesics were frequently used for insect bites. Antidotes were most common in dog (58%) and snake bites (26%). Of two cat bite cases, only one received antibiotics; neither received tetanus toxoid, despite the known infection risk. Qualitative findings highlighted three themes: clinical presentations, treatment modalities, and outcomes. Respondents described primary (e.g., bleeding, pain) and systemic (e.g., respiratory distress, neurological signs) symptoms. Treatment involved a mix of pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and traditional methods. While most patients recovered, some experienced complications or death.
conclusionPHC facilities manage most animal-related injuries effectively, but gaps in documentation, guideline adherence, and referral systems remain. Strengthening provider training, improving resources, and engaging traditional healers may enhance timely care. Broader surveillance and community education are critical to reducing preventable harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.