Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892859›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

DFU_DIALNet: Towards reliable and trustworthy diabetic foot ulcer detection with synergistic confluence of Grad-CAM and LIME.

Monirul Islam Mahmud, Md Shihab Reza, Mohammad Olid Ali Akash, Farhana Elias, Nova Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monirul Islam MahmudDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2812-8553
Md Shihab RezaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Olid Ali AkashDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farhana EliasDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nova AhmedDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes which needs early detection to help in timely treatment for preventing future serious consequences. Due to peripheral neuropathy, high blood glucose levels, and untreated wounds, DFUs can cause the disintegration of the skin and exposing the tissue below it, if not adequately treated. Recently deep learning (DL) has advanced and has shown its ability to automate DFU detection and classification by analysing medical images. The use of DL has been proven to be very useful for healthcare professionals, enabling earlier diagnosis and effective treatment of DFU. However, most of the studies predominantly rely on a single dataset (e.g., DFUC2021 or DFUC2020) without external validation or cross-dataset testing, raising concerns about generalizability and trustworthiness. The aim of this study is to develop a robust, reliable, and transparent DFU detection framework which is not only good performing but also can effectively give attention to the proper region of the images which are crucial for DFU detection. So, to make DFU detection robust, reliable in a single study, we proposed a custom approach, DFU_DIALNet and to enhance transparency and interpret the model decisions in this study, we integrated Grad-CAM and LIME heatmaps to precisely localize ulcer regions. This allows visual verification of the model's focus and clarifies the decision-making process, thereby increasing the model's reliability. DFU_DIALNet outperforms all other traditional models with 99.33% accuracy, 99% F1 score, and 100% AUC score, and compared it to other DL models-DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB0, ResNet50V2 and VGG16-in the merged dataset of DFUC2021 with our collected 500 images. We have checked our model's reliability with 2 other popular datasets--the KDFU and DFUC2020 datasets, where our proposed approach gives the highest accuracy of 95.61% and 99.54%, respectively, compared to other deep learning approaches. Lastly, we have developed a web app using Streamlit to detect DFU efficiently. This study fills the gap between reliable and interpretable systems with a proposed approach to the efficient detection of DFU.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetic FootHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40892859
PMCPMC12404406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.