ArticlePloS one2025
Bycatch survival of shortfin mako sharks (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the U.S. Atlantic pelagic longline fishery.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe population declines of shortfin mako sharks (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the Atlantic Ocean have led to the implementation of conservation measures, notably fishing retention bans and live-release regulations, aimed at substantially reducing fishing mortality to allow stock recovery. While retention bans can eliminate harvest mortality, their effectiveness can be reduced if survival of sharks encountered as bycatch and not retained is low. We quantified at-vessel survival (AVS) and post-release survival (PRS) and estimated overall bycatch survival probability of mako sharks for the U.S. Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. Based on fisheries observer records (n = 7821) between 2000-2020, we found AVS varied regionally from 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.80) in the northmost observation region to 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61-0.69) in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). We found significant negative correlations between AVS and soak time, surface temperature, mainline length, and shark size. Based on pop-up archival satellite tags (n = 27) deployed from pelagic longline vessels in the WNA during 2022-2024, PRS was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93). Overall mean bycatch survival probability varied regionally from 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.68) in the northmost observation region to 0.59 (95% CI: 0.49-0.64) in the GOM, which given the low productivity rates of mako sharks may be low enough to hinder recovery efforts if mako sharks are encountered as bycatch in significant numbers. Pairing retention bans with actions that reduce incidence of bycatch would likely provide the greatest benefit to population recovery. Our research highlights the importance of quantifying survival regionally and between fleets, as variability in fishing practices and environmental conditions can result in different bycatch survival outcomes, which can be important considerations in stock assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.