ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting 30-day hospital readmissions using ClinicalT5 with structured and unstructured electronic health records.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A hybrid ML-PBPK digital twin framework for clinically interpretable readmission risk and drug exposure stratification in diabetes.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital readmission prediction is a crucial area of research due to its impact on healthcare expenditure, patient care quality, and policy formulation. Accurate prediction of patient readmissions within 30 days post-discharge remains a considerable challenging, given the complexity of healthcare data, which includes both structured (e.g., demographic, clinical) and unstructured (e.g., clinical notes, medical images) data. Consequently, there is an increasing need for hybrid approaches that effectively integrate these two data types to enhance all-cause readmission prediction performance. Despite notable advancements in machine learning, existing predictive models often struggle to achieve both high precision and balanced predictions, mainly due to the variability in patients' outcome and the complex factors influencing readmissions. This study seeks to address these challenges by developing a hybrid predictive model that combines structured data with unstructured text representations derived from ClinicalT5, a transformer-based large language model. The performance of these hybrid models is evaluated against text-only models, such as PubMedBERT, using multiple metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and AUROC score. The results demonstrate that the hybrid models, which integrate both structured and unstructured data, outperform text-only models trained on the same dataset. Specifically, hybrid models achieve higher precision and balanced recall, reducing false positives and providing more reliable predictions. This research underscores the potential of hybrid data integration, using ClinicalT5, to improve hospital readmission prediction, thereby improving healthcare outcomes through more accurate predictions that can support better clinical decision making and reduce unnecessary readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.