ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluation of shotgun metagenomics as a diagnostic tool for infectious gastroenteritis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious gastroenteritis is a significant health issue globally. Identifying the causative pathogen is crucial for treatment, infection control and epidemiological surveillance. While PCR-based analyses are fast and sensitive, they only detect known pathogens. Clinical metagenomics can potentially identify novel or unexpected pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate shotgun metagenomics for detecting diarrhoeal pathogens in faecal samples from patients with infectious gastroenteritis and spiked samples from healthy donors, compared to PCR. DNA from clinical faecal samples (n = 12), spiked samples (n = 36), and control samples (n = 7) were analysed by PCR and shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Reads were taxonomically assigned, assembled, and binned into MAGs. MAGs were taxonomically assigned, and virulence genes were detected in bacterial assemblies and MAGs. Pathogens detected by PCR were also identified by taxonomic assignment of reads, though with lower sensitivity. Taxonomic assignment of MAGs identified 50% of bacterial pathogens and HAdV-F. Additional potential pathogens were observed in most samples. More bacterial virulence genes were detected in assemblies than in MAGs. In spiked samples, C. jejuni and HAdV-F were detected by both PCR and metagenomics, with significant correlation between Cq values and reads. Parasites were detected by few reads. Metagenomics has lower sensitivity compared to PCR but can provide supplementary information relevant for treatment. Challenges include additional potential pathogens, background microbiome, and introduced kitome, necessitating optimized extraction methods and strict quality controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.