ArticlePloS one2025
An intelligent diagnosis method for cardiovascular diseases based on the CNN-CBAM-GRU model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is essential for improving patient outcomes. As a primary diagnostic modality, electrocardiogram (ECG) signals pose challenges for automatic classification due to their complex temporal and morphological characteristics. This study proposes a CNN-CBAM-GRU model that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) to enhance both spatial feature representation and temporal sequence modeling. The model is evaluated on two public ECG datasets-MIT-BIH and PTB-XL-under five-class classification settings. Unlike many existing approaches that report only a limited set of metrics, this study conducts a comprehensive evaluation across multiple performance indicators, including accuracy, precision, recall, sensitivity, and F1-score, providing a more complete view of classification effectiveness. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a strong balance between predictive performance and computational efficiency. Specifically, it achieves 98.17% accuracy and 98.91% F1-score on MIT-BIH, and 99.21% accuracy and 99.47% F1-score on PTB-XL, with a compact parameter size of 2.45 million. These findings validate the proposed model as a practical and robust solution for intelligent ECG classification and automated cardiovascular disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.