Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892776›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Journal data-sharing policies and its impact in publications: A cross-sectional study protocol.

Pinge Zhao, Xin Zhang, Liandi Dai, Baoguo Ma, Yuting Duan, Yan Xu, Hongmei Wei, Shengwei Wu, Linghui Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pinge ZhaoThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-9901
Xin ZhangThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Liandi DaiThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Baoguo MaThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuting DuanEvidence-based Medicine Center, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yan XuThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hongmei WeiThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Shengwei WuThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Linghui XiongThe Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responsible data sharing in clinical research can enhance the transparency and reproducibility of research evidence, thereby increasing the overall value of research. Since 2024, more than 5,000 journals have adhered to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Data Sharing Statement (DSS) to promote data sharing. However, due to the significant effort required for data sharing and the scarcity of academic rewards, data availability in clinical research remains suboptimal. This study aims to explore the impact of biomedical journal policies and available supporting information on the implementation of data availability in clinical research publications This cross-sectional study will select 303 journals and their latest publications as samples from the biomedical journals listed in the Web of Science Journal Citation Reports based on stratified random sampling according to the 2023 Journal Impact Factor (JIF). Two researchers will independently extract journal data-sharing policies from the submission guidelines of eligible journals and data-sharing details from publications using a pre-designed form from Apr 2025 to Dec 2025. The data sharing levels of publications will be based on the openness of the data-sharing mechanism. Binomial logistic regression analyses will be used to identify potential journal factors that affect publication data-sharing levels. This protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EX6DV.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEditorial PoliciesInformation DisseminationPeriodicals as TopicPublicationsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJournal Impact Factor

Identifiers

PMID40892776
PMCPMC12404463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.