Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892761›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Improving attachment style clustering with ROCKET and CatBoost: Insights from EEG analysis.

Dor Mizrahi, Ilan Laufer, Inon Zuckerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dor MizrahiDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7957-3519
Ilan LauferDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Inon ZuckermanDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding attachment styles is essential in psychology and neuroscience, yet predicting them using objective neural data remains challenging. This study explores the use of machine learning (ML) models and EEG analysis to improve attachment style classification. We analyzed EEG data from 27 university students (ages 20-35) with attachment styles categorized as secure, avoidant, anxious, or fearful-avoidant, assessed using the ECR-R questionnaire. EEG features were extracted using the ROCKET algorithm, followed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction. The CatBoost algorithm was used for prediction, with a two-stage data pruning approach to enhance accuracy. Our model showed a strong relationship between the number of EEG epochs and predictive accuracy, with Secure and Fearful-Avoidant attachment styles being predicted most reliably. Anxious and Avoidant styles exhibited greater variability, reflecting their complex neural signatures. These findings support the idea that attachment exists on a spectrum rather than as fixed categories, influenced by life experiences, emotional regulation, and social context. The results reinforce the dimensional nature of attachment and highlight the trade-off between model accuracy and computational efficiency. This study demonstrates the potential of ML-driven EEG analysis in predicting attachment styles, offering new possibilities for psychological assessment. By identifying overlapping neural signatures, our findings highlight attachment as a dynamic rather than static process, which could inform clinical interventions and future research on neural markers of attachment.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyObject AttachmentAdultAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePrincipal Component AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40892761
PMCPMC12404378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.