ArticlePloS one2025
Using protection motivation theory to support patient adherence in healthcare settings: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions and Experiences of Barriers to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Among Pregnant Women: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Determinants of proactive health behaviors in individuals at high risks of stroke: a structural equation model analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtection motivation theory (PMT) shows promise as a basis for motivating healthy behaviours in healthcare settings. There has been no systematic overview of how PMT has been translated into clinical practice and which translation strategies effectively improve outcomes.
objectivesThis scoping review aimed to systematically map and synthesise existing literature on PMT-based interventions targeting health behaviours in healthcare contexts.
methodsMedline, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for studies applying PMT within healthcare contexts. Eligible populations had a clinical condition. To be eligible, studies had to report a healthcare-delivered PMT intervention with adherence outcomes directly benefiting participants. Two reviewers extracted data on study features, intervention characteristics including behaviour change techniques employed, PMT constructs addressed, results, and research recommendations. Findings were summarised narratively and tabulated.
resultsThirteen studies published between 1998 and 2023 met the eligibility criteria, including 12 randomised trials. Studies addressed acute and chronic conditions across primary, secondary, and non-clinical settings. Half significantly improved behaviour outcomes in intervention groups. All targeted coping-self-efficacy and perceived threat-severity PMT constructs to some degree. Combinations of behaviour change techniques did not clearly differentiate successful outcomes. Studies recommended longer follow-up, clarifying effective PMT component combinations, and drawing on multiple behaviour theories. DISCUSSION: Despite heterogeneity in how PMT interventions were operationalised, they show potential benefits for motivating adherence to healthy behaviours. To enable optimisation and dissemination, consistent nonadherence detection and reporting methods are critical. Further research should include translation of PMT to other healthcare settings, refining methodology and implementing well-powered effectiveness trials in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.