Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892720›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Development and validation of a risk prediction tool for drug-related problems in pre-operative elective surgical patients (mediPORT): A case-control study.

Stephanie Clemens, Clara Simon, Wanda Lauth, Olaf Rose, Georg Zimmermann, Peter Gerner, Christina Dückelmann, Maria Flamm, Johanna Pachmayr

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephanie ClemensInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology & Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-9329
Clara SimonInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology & Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Wanda LauthTeam Biostatistics and Big Medical Data, IDA Lab Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Olaf RoseInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology & Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Georg ZimmermannTeam Biostatistics and Big Medical Data, IDA Lab Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-1034
Peter GernerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Christina DückelmannInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology & Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Maria FlammCenter of Public Health and Health Services Research, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Johanna PachmayrInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology & Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-related problems (DRP) in pre-operative care can harm patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a pre-operative risk prediction tool (mediPORT) to calculate the probability of DRP in admitted patients.

methodsElective surgery patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted to the pre-anaesthesia clinic and participating in a medication review by pharmacists were included in this case-control study. Routinely reported patient variables were included in a backward stepwise logistic regression to determine the most relevant predictors (minimum Akaike Information Criterion) of DRP. Performances using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed to test the model. Internal validation was performed using a 10-fold cross-validation procedure.

resultsThe target population consisted of 11,176 participants, of whom 284 cases with ≥ 1 DRP and 980 controls without DRP were drawn. Most relevant predictors for DRP were age, number of drugs at admission, body mass index, sex and renal function. These factors were included in the final five variable model. A correlation between renal function and occurrence of DRP was found. Age and number of drugs frequently appeared in all models of the backwards elimination and represented an alternative two variable model. The AUC for predicting DRP were 0.823 (CI 95% 0.766-0.879) for the five-variable model and 0.872 (CI 95% 0.835-0.909) for the two-variable model. In the validation model, sensitivity was 77.6% and specificity was 76.5% for the five-variable model and 81.3%, 75% for the two-variable model, respectively.

conclusionsResulting equations can be used by hospital admission to identify patients at high risk, for whom a precise assessment of medication is critical.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElective Surgical ProceduresPreoperative CareAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID40892720
PMCPMC12404507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.