Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892716›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Investigating factors influencing fatalities and injuries in animal-vehicle crashes using a random parameters logit model and ensemble machine learning approaches.

Md Nabil Zawad, Mohammed Almannaa, Khalid F Alkahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Nabil ZawadDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8652-1738
Mohammed AlmannaaDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5893-3052
Khalid F AlkahtaniDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-vehicle crashes (AVC) pose risks in rural areas, often leading to casualties and injuries. Despite their infrequent occurrence, AVC can have significant consequences, especially when larger animals are involved. This study investigates factors contributing to fatalities and injuries resulting from animal-involved collisions. It examines 24 variables using 1403 animal-vehicle crash observations on intercity and major intra-city roads from 2016-2021. The study employs a random parameters logit model (RPLM) and ensemble machine learning approaches to explore the contributory factors in crashes. The RPLM accounts for unobserved heterogeneity, identifying significant variables. Meanwhile, the ensemble learner and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provide further insights. Key findings show that expressways, roads with one or two lanes per direction, horizontal curvature, and structurally poor pavement surfaces increase the risk of severe crashes, i.e., fatalities and injuries. Side fence barriers and speed bumps also impact crash severity. The absence of side fencing and damaged fencing both positively influence severe crashes, while the presence of speed bumps is likely to increase severe crashes. Camel exposure, vacation-period crashes, and adverse weather also play positive roles. However, heavy truck involvement is negatively associated with severe crashes. Policymakers and road safety authorities can use these findings to implement effective countermeasures to prevent such collisions.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficMachine LearningWounds and InjuriesAnimalsHumansLogistic ModelsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40892716
PMCPMC12404393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.