ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
Elucidating ultrasound imaging of /ɹ/ tongue shapes using full-wave numerical simulationsa).
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Midsagittal ultrasound images depict much of the tongue surface from root to tip, providing important articulatory information about tongue shape. However, portions of the tip can be obscured due to shadowing from the mandible bone and sublingual airspace. Also, tongue curvature or grooving within the elevational beam width can cause ambiguous or double-edge artifacts that obfuscate the midsagittal tongue surface. Because ensuing misinterpretations of tongue shape may negatively affect clinical and scientific assessments of speakers' articulation, this study characterizes causes of imaging artifacts and validates best practices for interpretation. Segmentations of /ɹ/ tongue shapes from magnetic resonance images (MRI) were compared to simulated ultrasound images, obtained by modeling full-wave acoustic wave propagation through segmented tissue models using the k-Wave toolbox. Acoustic parameters were adjusted to allow for accurate yet efficient simulations. The extent of tongue tip visibly missing from simulated images varied significantly across categories of /ɹ/ tongue shapes. Ambiguous edge artifacts occurred in 85% of parasagittal images, supporting the guideline to check midsagittal transducer placement when ambiguous edges are observed. The ground-truth tongue surface corresponded to local brightness maxima within the visible tongue contour. For 92% of ambiguous edges, the most proximal brightness maximum corresponded to the midsagittal tongue surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.