Trial reportJAMA neurology2025
Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Medical Management Alone for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03342664 (MIND), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MIND: A Prospective, Multicenter Study of Artemis a Minimally Invasive Neuro Evacuation Device, in the Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI Models for Surgical Decision Support in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review in Relation to Trials and Guidelines.Neurocritical care · 2026Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Medical Management for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity Score-Matched Studies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Extension of the FUNC Score for Prediction of 12-Month Functional Independence after Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Evacuation Under Local Anesthesia for Subacute Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Older Adults.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Postoperative Neurocritical Care After Minimally Invasive Evacuation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Article
- A mouse model of mechanical stress injury to the basal ganglia using thermosensitive PNIPAM hydrogel for intracerebral hemorrhage research.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Corticospinal tract risk modifies motor recovery after minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage: a secondary analysis of MISTIE-III.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Neurointerventional Advances in 2025.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- ESO annual stroke evidence update 2025.European stroke journal · 2026Review
- Is Dexamethasone Helpful in Reducing Perihematoma Edema and for the Outcome of Intracerebral Hemorrhage?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Evacuation for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Contemporary Randomized Trials: Patient Selection, Timing, and Platform Choice.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- Minimal-access exoscopic approach for caudate hemorrhage with intraventricular extension using the ViewSite Brain Access System.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- The identification of white matter fibers in the hematoma of intracerebral hemorrhage patients.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Dutch Intracerebral Haemorrhage Surgery Trial: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial of minimally invasive endoscopy-guided surgery in patients with spontaneous, supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- A critical appraisal of the MIND trial on minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Surgical management of intracerebral hemorrhage: A meta-analysis demonstrating improved functional outcome and survival with time-dependent functional benefit.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage: new evidence and changing perspectives.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: It remains uncertain whether surgical evacuation improves functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery with the Artemis Neuro Evacuation Device to guideline-based medical management alone for spontaneous supratentorial ICH. Design, Setting, and Participants: The MIND open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial randomized patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH in a 2:1 ratio to either minimally invasive surgery or medical management alone. Participants were enrolled at 32 participating global sites between February 6, 2018, and August 28, 2023. This article reports on the primary trial outcome. Of 4066 eligible adult patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate- to large-volume supratentorial ICH (20-80 mL), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher, and Glasgow Coma Scale score between 5 and 15, 154 were randomized to minimally invasive surgery and 82 to medical management. Data were analyzed from February to September 2024. Intervention: Minimally invasive surgery (within 72 hours of symptom onset) plus medical management or medical management alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was 180-day combined death and disability via ordinal modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The primary safety outcome was 30-day mortality. Results: Following an independent feasibility analysis prompted by the publication of positive results of a contemporaneous ICH trial, enrollment was stopped early at 236 participants. Overall median (IQR) participant age was 60 (50-70) years, 87 participants (36.9%) were female, 164 (69.5%) had primarily deep bleeds, and 72 (30.5%) had primarily lobar bleeds. Efficacy results of the primary model analysis suggested lack of evidence for the superiority of minimally invasive surgery over medical management (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 96% CI, 0.62-1.72; P = .45). The adjusted model's mean OR was also nonsignificantly greater than 1 (OR, 1.10; 96% CI, 0.66-1.85; P = .35). By 30 days, 11 participants (7.2%) in the surgery group and 8 (9.8%) in the medical management group died (difference, -2.5%; 95% CI, -11.7% to 4.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: In the MIND randomized clinical trial, minimally invasive surgery within 72 hours did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality or improve 180-day disability in patients with supratentorial ICH compared to medical management alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342664.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.