Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892424›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2025

Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Medical Management Alone for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.

Adam S Arthur, Babak S Jahromi, Paul S Saphier, Christopher M Nickele, Robert W Ryan, Peter Vajkoczy, Clemens M Schirmer, Christopher P Kellner, Charles C Matouk, Eric J Arias and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03342664 (MIND), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03342664 nacompletednot on this map

MIND: A Prospective, Multicenter Study of Artemis a Minimally Invasive Neuro Evacuation Device, in the Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorPenumbra Inc.Ran2018 to 2024Enrolled236ConditionsCerebral Hemorrhage, Brain Hemorrhage, Cerebral Parenchymal Hemorrhage, Intracerebral HemorrhageArmsArtemis + Medical Management, Best Medical Management Alone (MM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurointerventional Advances in 2025.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  11. ESO annual stroke evidence update 2025.European stroke journal · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adam S ArthurDepartment of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Clinic and University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis.
Babak S JahromiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Paul S SaphierCoaxial Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, New Jersey.
Christopher M NickeleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Clinic and University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis.
Robert W RyanVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Peter VajkoczyCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Clemens M SchirmerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Christopher P KellnerMount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
Charles C MatoukDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Eric J AriasCarePoint Neurosurgery, HCA HealthONE Swedish, Englewood, Colorado.
Jamie S UllmanZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.
Michael R LevittDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Radiology, Neurology, and Mechanical Engineering and Stroke & Applied NeuroScience Center, University of Washington, Seattle.
Ziad A HageNovant Health Presbyterian Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
David J FiorellaStony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York.
MIND Study Investigators and Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It remains uncertain whether surgical evacuation improves functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery with the Artemis Neuro Evacuation Device to guideline-based medical management alone for spontaneous supratentorial ICH. Design, Setting, and Participants: The MIND open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial randomized patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH in a 2:1 ratio to either minimally invasive surgery or medical management alone. Participants were enrolled at 32 participating global sites between February 6, 2018, and August 28, 2023. This article reports on the primary trial outcome. Of 4066 eligible adult patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate- to large-volume supratentorial ICH (20-80 mL), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher, and Glasgow Coma Scale score between 5 and 15, 154 were randomized to minimally invasive surgery and 82 to medical management. Data were analyzed from February to September 2024. Intervention: Minimally invasive surgery (within 72 hours of symptom onset) plus medical management or medical management alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was 180-day combined death and disability via ordinal modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The primary safety outcome was 30-day mortality. Results: Following an independent feasibility analysis prompted by the publication of positive results of a contemporaneous ICH trial, enrollment was stopped early at 236 participants. Overall median (IQR) participant age was 60 (50-70) years, 87 participants (36.9%) were female, 164 (69.5%) had primarily deep bleeds, and 72 (30.5%) had primarily lobar bleeds. Efficacy results of the primary model analysis suggested lack of evidence for the superiority of minimally invasive surgery over medical management (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 96% CI, 0.62-1.72; P = .45). The adjusted model's mean OR was also nonsignificantly greater than 1 (OR, 1.10; 96% CI, 0.66-1.85; P = .35). By 30 days, 11 participants (7.2%) in the surgery group and 8 (9.8%) in the medical management group died (difference, -2.5%; 95% CI, -11.7% to 4.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: In the MIND randomized clinical trial, minimally invasive surgery within 72 hours did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality or improve 180-day disability in patients with supratentorial ICH compared to medical management alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342664.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40892424
PMCPMC12406146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.