Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2025
Patient and Caregiver Outcomes of Health System, Community-Based, and Usual Dementia Care: A Prespecified Analysis of the Dementia Care Study (D-CARE) Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786471 (Comparative Effectiveness of Health System-based Versus Community-Based Dementia Care / A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Dementia Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Health System-based Versus Community-Based Dementia Care / A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Dementia Care
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Alleviating Burden on Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Correlates and predictors of self-efficacy among dementia caregivers: D-CARE findings.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Despite the large numbers of persons living with dementia, the best approach to providing dementia care is unknown. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of health system dementia care (HSDC), community-based dementia care (CBDC), and usual care (UC) on person living with dementia and caregiver outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Dementia Care Study (D-CARE) was a pragmatic, 18-month, 3-armed, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2019 through August 2023 at 4 clinical trial sites in North Carolina, Texas, and Pennsylvania. Person living with dementia-caregiver dyads were included. Data were analyzed from December 2024 to June 2025. Interventions: HSDC comanagement by nurse practitioners or physician assistants or CBDC provided telephonically by a social worker, nurse, or licensed therapist for 18 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified outcomes included person living with dementia cognition, functional status, and quality of life; caregiver ratings of quality of care (10 items; range, 0-10) and satisfaction with care (11 items; range, 11-55), including how helpful the dementia care was, access to services, and support; positive aspects of caregiving; and overall caregiver burden as well as a measure of whether either the person living with dementia or caregiver benefitted. Results: A total of 2176 person living with dementia-caregiver dyads were enrolled; 1271 persons living with dementia (58.4%) and 1650 caregivers (75.8%) were female, and their mean (SD) age were 80.6 (8.5) years and 65.2 (12.3) years, respectively. There were no treatment differences between groups in person living with dementia functional status, cognition, or quality of life or in overall caregiver burden or positive aspects of caregiving. Caregiver satisfaction with care was higher with both interventions compared with UC (HSDC: least-squares mean difference, 2.6 points; 98.3% CI, 1.0-4.2; P < .001; CBDC: least-squares mean difference, 3.3 points; 98.3% CI, 1.7-4.9; P < .001). The difference in caregiver satisfaction with care between the interventions and UC was apparent by 3 months and persisted through the study. Caregiver-rated quality of care was higher in the CBDC group compared with UC (least-squares mean ratio, 1.1; 98.3% CI, 1.0-1.3; P = .046). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, HSDC and CBDC did not differ from UC on most person living with dementia and caregiver measures. However, caregivers reported higher satisfaction with both interventions compared with UC. These findings can help further refine comprehensive dementia care programs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03786471.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.