Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892399›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2025

Patient and Caregiver Outcomes of Health System, Community-Based, and Usual Dementia Care: A Prespecified Analysis of the Dementia Care Study (D-CARE) Randomized Clinical Trial.

David B Reuben, Alan B Stevens, Thomas M Gill, Jeff Williamson, Elena Volpi, Maya L Lichtenstein, Lee A Jennings, Rebecca Galloway, Jenny Summapund, Katy Araujo and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786471 (Comparative Effectiveness of Health System-based Versus Community-Based Dementia Care / A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Dementia Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03786471 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Effectiveness of Health System-based Versus Community-Based Dementia Care / A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Dementia Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2019 to 2023Enrolled2,176ConditionsDementiaArmsHealth System-based Dementia Care, Community-based Dementia Care, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Correlates and predictors of self-efficacy among dementia caregivers: D-CARE findings.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

David B ReubenDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Alan B StevensBaylor Scott White Health, Dallas, Texas.
Thomas M GillYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jeff WilliamsonAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Elena VolpiUniversity of Texas Health, San Antonio and San Antonio Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, San Antonio.
Maya L LichtensteinGeisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Lee A JenningsUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Rebecca GallowayUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Jenny SummapundDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Katy AraujoYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
David BassBenjamin Rose Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lisa WeitzmanBenjamin Rose Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Zaldy S TanCedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Leslie C EvertsonUCLA Health, Los Angeles, California.
Mia YangAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Aval-Na'Ree S GreenBaylor Scott White Health, Dallas, Texas.
Rafael Samper-TernentThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Pamela BorekGeisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Yunshan XuYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Peter PeduzziYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Erich J GreeneYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
D-CARE Study

Funding

Wake Forest University School of Medicine Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072947 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE CRAFT · 2021 to 2026
$24.3M
Pragmatic Trial of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Dementia Care.R01AG061078 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI REUBEN, DAVID B. · 2018 to 2023
$8.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite the large numbers of persons living with dementia, the best approach to providing dementia care is unknown. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of health system dementia care (HSDC), community-based dementia care (CBDC), and usual care (UC) on person living with dementia and caregiver outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Dementia Care Study (D-CARE) was a pragmatic, 18-month, 3-armed, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2019 through August 2023 at 4 clinical trial sites in North Carolina, Texas, and Pennsylvania. Person living with dementia-caregiver dyads were included. Data were analyzed from December 2024 to June 2025. Interventions: HSDC comanagement by nurse practitioners or physician assistants or CBDC provided telephonically by a social worker, nurse, or licensed therapist for 18 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified outcomes included person living with dementia cognition, functional status, and quality of life; caregiver ratings of quality of care (10 items; range, 0-10) and satisfaction with care (11 items; range, 11-55), including how helpful the dementia care was, access to services, and support; positive aspects of caregiving; and overall caregiver burden as well as a measure of whether either the person living with dementia or caregiver benefitted. Results: A total of 2176 person living with dementia-caregiver dyads were enrolled; 1271 persons living with dementia (58.4%) and 1650 caregivers (75.8%) were female, and their mean (SD) age were 80.6 (8.5) years and 65.2 (12.3) years, respectively. There were no treatment differences between groups in person living with dementia functional status, cognition, or quality of life or in overall caregiver burden or positive aspects of caregiving. Caregiver satisfaction with care was higher with both interventions compared with UC (HSDC: least-squares mean difference, 2.6 points; 98.3% CI, 1.0-4.2; P < .001; CBDC: least-squares mean difference, 3.3 points; 98.3% CI, 1.7-4.9; P < .001). The difference in caregiver satisfaction with care between the interventions and UC was apparent by 3 months and persisted through the study. Caregiver-rated quality of care was higher in the CBDC group compared with UC (least-squares mean ratio, 1.1; 98.3% CI, 1.0-1.3; P = .046). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, HSDC and CBDC did not differ from UC on most person living with dementia and caregiver measures. However, caregivers reported higher satisfaction with both interventions compared with UC. These findings can help further refine comprehensive dementia care programs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03786471.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunity Health ServicesDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID40892399
PMCPMC12406143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.