ArticleJAMA neurology2025
Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Risk of Meningioma in the US.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic hallmarks of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate-associated meningiomas.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- A Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Immunosensor Based on Core-Shell SiOFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exogenous Hormones and Their Clinical Implications for the Development and Growth of Meningioma Tumours.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Contraceptive Progestogens and Incident Meningioma.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A proteogenomic RNA processing mechanism drives sex differences in meningioma.Research square · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Cerebral Meningioma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Medical Treatment for Endometriosis: One Size Does Not Fit All.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Associations of surgical menopause and hormone replacement therapy with meningioma development.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Progestogen use and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: There lacks data clarifying the meningioma risk conferred by depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in the US. Objective: To examine the relative risk of meningioma diagnosis in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and other related progestins. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study used data from TriNetX, a US national database of 68 health care organizations. Data were analyzed from December 2004 to December 2024. The incidence of meningioma diagnosis was compared between treatment groups through propensity-score matched analyses. Participants included a sample of females with use of only 1 of the following progestins/contraceptives: depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral medroxyprogesterone acetate, combined oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, progestin only pills, or subdermal implantable contraceptive. The control group included females without use of these hormonal treatments. Of the 118 289 082 total patients in TriNetX at the time of analysis, 61 588 239 patients were female and eligible. Exposures: Patients were defined using diagnostic codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Current Procedural Terminology, and RxNorm codes within TriNetX. Main Outcome and Measure: The main outcome was meningioma diagnosis. Relative risks and number needed to harm were calculated. Results: There were 10 425 438 patients that met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 33.4 years at inclusion. After propensity score matching, 88 667 patients with mean age of 26.2 years at inclusion were in the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate group. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate had a relative risk of 2.43 (95% CI, 1.77-3.33) for meningioma diagnosis compared with controls. Notably, this risk was confined for patients with longer than 4 years of exposure or starting the prescription at ages older than 31 years. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate had increased relative risk of 1.18 (95% CI, 1.10-1.27) compared with controls. No increased risk of meningioma diagnosis was found with any other contraceptive. The number needed to harm for the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate was 1152 patients and 3020 patients for oral medroxyprogesterone acetate. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate had a greater relative risk of subsequent meningioma diagnosis, especially with prolonged exposures and starting the medication at older ages. The high number needed to harm suggests low clinical risk overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.