Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892349›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Shape and word parts combine linearly in the Bouba-Kiki effect.

Ananya Passi, S P Arun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ananya PassiUndergraduate Programme, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, 560012.
S P ArunCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, 560012. sparun@iisc.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-5066

Funding

Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance IA/S/17/1/503081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Languages have evolved in part due to cross-modal associations between shape and sound. A famous example is the Bouba-Kiki effect, wherein humans associate words like bouba/kiki to round/angular shapes. How does the Bouba-Kiki effect work for natural words and shapes that contain a mixture of features? If the effect is holistic, the effect for a composite stimulus would not be explainable using the parts. If the effect is compositional, it will be. Here we provide evidence for the latter possibility. In Experiments 1 and 2, we standardized bouba-like and kiki-like shapes and words for use in subsequent experiments. In Experiments 3-5, we created composite shapes/words by combining bouba-like & kiki-like parts. In all experiments, the Bouba-Kiki effect strength for composite shapes/words was predicted remarkably well as a linear sum of the contributions of the constituent parts. Our results greatly simplify our understanding of the Bouba-Kiki effect, leaving little room for holism.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualReadingSemanticsAttentionHumansMultisensory processingVisual perceptionWord perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.