ArticleLa Radiologia medica2025
Radiomics-based prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a non-invasive approach to treatment stratification.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiomics for predicting microsatellite instability-high status in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Interpretable intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics using SHAP for predicting microsatellite status in gastric adenocarcinoma: a dual-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for perioperative precision in surgical oncology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Using Two Internally Validated Radiomic Models.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeManagement of colorectal cancer (CRC) is determined by the stage of the disease and molecular features, such as microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI-high/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors respond better to immunotherapy but poorly to 5-FU-based treatments. With increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy there is interest in developing non-invasive, radiomics models based on preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scans to predict MSI status and support personalized therapy. MATERIAL AND
methodsAdult patients diagnosed with CRC who underwent pre-treatment staging with contrast-enhanced CT and had known MSI status were retrospectively analyzed. Portal venous phase images were assessed. Two radiologists, blinded to MSI status, manually segmented tumor regions on CT images. Radiomic features and statistical modeling were used to develop a predictive model for identifying the MSI-H phenotype.
resultsAnalysis was conducted on 54 adult CRC patients who had undergone staging CT scans with known MSI status. Two different models were built considering different brands of CT machines. Twenty statistically significant radiomic features from the portal venous phase of CT images able to differentiate MSI from microsatellite stable (MSS) patients were selected for each model. LASSO regression was applied, selecting features for model construction. The best model's performance demonstrated an area under the ROC curve of 0.844 (95% CI = 0.73-0.96 DeLong, p < 0,05).
conclusionThe results demonstrate the potential of the radiomics model as a non-invasive, cost-effective tool for MSI evaluation, guiding CRC therapy. It aids in identifying patients who would benefit from immunotherapy or chemotherapy, supporting the therapeutic shift from postoperative to preoperative treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40892331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.