ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
iThermonitor: A wearable non-invasive high-precision alternative to traditional temperature monitoring in thoracoscopic surgery of lateral decubitus position.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In thoracoscopic surgery, temperature monitoring is essential but traditionally relies on invasive methods such as esophageal or rectal thermometry, which risk mucosal injury and patient discomfort. This trial evaluates the iThermonitor, a wireless wearable axillary thermometer, as a non-invasive alternative aiming to minimize procedural trauma while maintaining clinical accuracy. We enrolled 80 adult patients scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia between December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. Axillary temperature (iThermonitor) and lower esophageal temperature (reference standard) were recorded every 3 minutes. The primary endpoint was the agreement between devices (± 0.5 °C). Among 3536 temperature pairs, 93.96% of iThermonitor readings were within ± 0.5 °C of lower esophageal values (95% CI: 91.94–95.85%), with strong correlation (Pearson r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). The device demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for hypothermia (<36.0 °C; AUC = 0.876). Esophageal probes caused bloodstaining in 73.8% of cases, whereas iThermonitor-related skin redness (45%) resolved postoperatively. The iThermonitor is a reliable and accurate non-invasive alternative to traditional invasive temperature monitoring methods in thoracoscopic surgery. It effectively detects perioperative hypothermia and offers significant patient-centered benefits, including enhanced comfort and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.