ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Adoption and implementation of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training approach: an experience from tertiary referral center.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning curves and outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery: A single-surgeon experience within a structured dual-console training program.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic colorectal surgery is rapidly growing field. It offers potential benefits over laparoscopy and these benefits are best realized with proper training. This study reports the outcomes of our first 150 consecutive cases of robotic colorectal surgery following standardized training program. Prospectively collected data for the first consecutive 150 robotic colorectal surgery procedures were analyzed for short-term outcomes. The training program followed the curriculum of the European Academy for Robotic Colorectal Surgery (EARCS) which included theoretical knowledge, online simulator training, console and bedside skills training under direct expert supervision, and objective assessment using the Global Assessment Score (GAS) form. 133/150 (89%) cases were for colorectal cancer with 61% of cases performed for rectal cancer. Two-thirds of the patients were male, median age of 54 years (range 29-87) and BMI of 28.5 (range 21-57). All procedures (n = 150) were performed by three surgeons. There were no mortalities or conversions to open or laparoscopy. Anastomotic leak rate was 1.3% and the overall R0 resection was achieved in 95.5% of cases. Standardized training program expedited the safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery in our center with satisfactory oncological and clinical short-term outcomes. This study contributes valuable data on the safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery and the application of standardized training program in the Middle East and other regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.