ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Sarcoidosis].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueSarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease of unknown cause, characterized by the formation of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas, which can potentially affect nearly every organ. The lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes are most commonly affected-with granulomatous involvement found in approximately 90% of cases. Typically, younger adults are affected by sarcoidosis. The clinical picture and the course of the disease can vary significantly, which is why it is also referred to as the "great mimicker". The aim of this review is to provide an overview on the imaging findings in patients with sarcoidosis. In addition, the current diagnostic and therapeutic management will be elaborated. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsThe conventional chest radiograph has long been considered a fundamental examination in suspected sarcoidosis. Traditionally, staging is performed according to the Scadding classification (stages 0-IV). However, computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used due to its higher accuracy and availability. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Recently, seven dedicated radiologic phenotypes of sarcoidosis have been identified on CT, comprising four nonfibrotic and three fibrotic subtypes. Given the superior accuracy of CT and its potential role in therapy monitoring, baseline high-resolution CT (HRCT) is increasingly recommended. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory multisystem disease involving the lungs and thoracic lymph nodes in approximately 90% of cases. Current guidelines still recommend chest radiography as the initial imaging modality for diagnosis and staging; however, CT is increasingly being used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40892221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.