ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Neuromuscular control of a five-finger pinch task is influenced by training history.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand control for dexterous and strength-based tasks involves several levels of the neuromuscular system which interact to produce force. We investigated hand force, motor unit (MU) control, and intermuscular coherence in specialist-trained groups to identify how training may affect neuromuscular force control and motor neuron activity. Equal groups of ten strength-trained (rock climbers) and dexterity-trained (musicians) individuals participated. Measures of forearm muscle structure were recorded and used to normalize maximal five-finger pinch force. Several submaximal trapezoidal pinch contractions were performed while force and electromyography (EMG) were recorded, and force steadiness was calculated. Motor unit firing rates were calculated from spike trains identified by surface EMG decomposition. Intermuscular coherence was calculated between two muscles controlling the hand (the abductor pollicis brevis and flexor digitorum superificialis), providing an estimate of the common synaptic inputs to these simultaneously activated muscles. Strength-trained participants had a higher force capacity (even when normalized to muscle size) and were steadier at controlling forces. The dexterity-trained group had faster MU discharge rates in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle at moderate force levels. Measures of synaptic inputs to the motor neuron pools were inconsistent. However, the largest peaks in the beta-band were at the lowest measured force level for the dexterity-trained group, while at the highest force intensity for the strength-trained group. These findings may indicate that the neuromuscular control of hand force differs between groups with different training histories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.