ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
Thirty years of high-voltage injuries: comparative analysis of train surfing and work-related cases with a focus on trauma-associated diagnoses.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Different flames, different fates : A comparative study of surgical interventions and critical care burden in electrical vs. thermal burn injuries.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHigh-voltage electrical injuries from train surfing pose a unique challenge, often involving severe burns and multisystem trauma. This study retrospectively analyzed train surfing injuries over 30 years, with a focus on trauma-associated diagnoses and comparing them to work-related high-voltage injuries.
methodsA retrospective review of 87 high-voltage injury cases was conducted, including 30 train surfing and 57 work-related cases. Demographics, injury patterns, injury time, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, surgical interventions, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, accident timing and trauma scores (Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Score (NACA), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)) were analyzed.
resultsTrain surfers were significantly younger (20.6 years vs. 36.0 years, p < 0.001) and sustained more severe burns (Total Body Surface Area (TBSA): 46.5% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001). The ABSI (7.1 vs. 5.1, p < 0.01) and ISS (25.0 vs. 12.0, p < 0.001) were higher in train surfers, reflecting greater injury severity. The ICU stays were longer (56.1 days vs. 15.8 days, p < 0.001) and fasciotomies (86.7% vs. 53.0%, p < 0.01) and amputations (56.7% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) were more frequent. Train surfers exhibited worse metabolic parameters (base excess -4.49 vs. -0.7 mmol/L, p < 0.001; lactate 3.2 vs. 2.6 mmol/L, p < 0.05) and higher AIS scores for head and thoracic trauma. The GCS at the accident site was lower in train surfers (11.1 vs. 13.0, p = 0.10), indicating more severe initial impairment. Accidents predominantly occurred at night (69.9% of train surfing cases vs. 3.5% of work-related cases, p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the train surfing group (20.0% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.01).
conclusionTrain surfing injuries involve extensive burns, severe multisystem trauma, and a higher surgical burden compared to work-related injuries. Their distinct injury patterns necessitate targeted prevention and specialized trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.